I have my problems with Meta, but I’m hoping this will help Mastodon grow

  • Martin@feddit.nu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Do we really want Facebook users just for the growth? Quality beats quantity.

    • Chewy@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      The good thing about the fediverse is that instances can choose with whom they want to federate.

      In my opinion, there should always be choice and people with terrible opinions should be allowed to express them – just like others should be allowed to laugh, ignore and block them. Whether we like it or not, the fediverse includes everything from left-wing to right-wing extremists. But we can choose an instance which excludes all those unwanted posts, just like we’ll be able to block surveillance corporate instances.

  • exocortex@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    Would it be possible for the mastodon software to detect if users are connecting via threads and replace all images in posts with a different image - one that says e.g. telling people that Zuckerberg doesn’t care about raising tennage suicide rates through Instagram or something similar.

  • Lvxferre@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    Fediverse? Do you mean, the Threadiverse?

    I’m being cheeky to illustrate a point - Threads will almost certainly harm the overall health of the Fediverse in the long run, with users relying increasingly more on Threads’ instance[s] to use Mastodon services and connect to people.

    • BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      This may be a cynical view, but even if that does happen, the core ActivityPub protocol will still be intact and at worst be relegated to a small community of tech nerds, which is to say, basically the status quo.