• henfredemars@infosec.pubEnglish
    3·
    3 months ago

    Definitely do this. It puts broadcasters in control of their data and their brand and not the arbitrary whims of some third party.

    • Wodge@lemmy.worldEnglish
      3·
      3 months ago

      Every company should do it. Have their own instance, have a main corporate account, one for each of their brands, and availability of for staff to have accounts there.

      Companies complain about the lack of moderation on twitter under Musk, so do something about it.

  • BedSharkPal@lemmy.caEnglish
    2·
    3 months ago

    I can’t believe all public entities didn’t jump on ASAP. It just makes so much sense.

  • thehatfox@lemmy.worldEnglish
    2·
    3 months ago

    In the UK the BBC are running their own instance social.bbc on trial basis, and I think the trial was recently extended.

    Hopefully other public bodies will follow suit.

    • Blackmist@feddit.ukEnglish
      2·
      3 months ago

      Pretty much all companies should be doing the same thing, not just public bodies.

      If you build your house on a king’s land, the king owns your house.

    • ripcord@lemmy.worldEnglish
      1·
      3 months ago

      You know, it just occurred to me that it’d probably be useful if there were providers providing and maintaining instances as turnkey operations. Most organizations won’t want to host themselves, but might still want to pay for a (reasonably cheap) instance.

      Anyone know what commercial options are out there? A really quick search didn’t turn up anything for me.

  • m-p{3}@lemmy.caEnglish
    2·
    3 months ago

    I wish, and that would also give another push to RSS feeds which are builtin, to follow people without having an account.

  • nivenkos@lemmy.worldEnglish
    1·
    3 months ago

    What is the Mastodon Lemmy.world equivalent? Like a big, neutral server with minimal censorship and bullshit, and access to most other servers?