• Corroded@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    9 months ago

    This and that article about the 16 year old that got arrested for cutting down a historic tree makes me wonder if there’s a way to uncut down a tree. Like using grafting and some kind of tree steroid

    • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 months ago

      It’s a bit like reattaching a penis. All the tubes are very particular in what they were connected to, so even if you graft it back on you cant direct all of them to reconnect the right way

      • tilcica@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        9 months ago

        and even if you do, the tree works by not having ANY air in them so as soon as there’s even the slightest amount of it, the tube wont work anymore

    • Squids@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      The closest thing to what you’re talking about is grafting, but that’s a specific thing that only works on certain species and I don’t think can “glue” two entire halves of a tree back together, maybe just a branch at the most if you’re very careful and lucky

      It’s why if you plant a seed from a random apple from the supermarket, you’re very probably not going to get a tree that produces that apple. Most commerical fruit trees (including ones from your local garden centre) tend to have a bottom half that’s hardy and resistant, and then a top half which was “glued” on that actually provides the fruit you want. The bottom half controls the genetic material in the seed, but the top half controls what the fruit will look like.

      On the other hand, you can totally glue a snapped cactus back together, provided it hasn’t been too long and the two halves aren’t too damaged.

      • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        9 months ago

        The bottom half controls the genetic material in the seed, but the top half controls what the fruit will look like.

        Yeah, that part isn’t true. The top half has the sexual organs, and controls both the fruit and the genetic content of the seed. The seed of that tree will be a genetic descendent of the top half, not the bottom half.

        The problem is, as the other commenter stated, that the offspring of the tree are not likely to share the specific combination of genetic code that makes the exact apple we are looking for. If you want that exact apple, you need a clone of the original tree, not a descendant of that tree.