Yes, I’m certain I could final answers to all these questions via research, but I’m coming here as part of the Reddit diaspora. My guess is that there’s a benefit to others like me to have this discussion.

I can vaguely understand the federation concept, the idea that my account is hosted at an individual Lemmy server and that other servers trust that one to validate my account. What’s the network flow like? I’m posting this to the lemmy.ml /asklemmy community, but I’m composing it on the sh.itjust.works interface. I’m assuming sh.itjust.works hands this over to lemmy.ml. How does my browsing work? Is all of my traffic routed through sh.itjust.works?

Assuming there’s a mass influx of redditors, what does it look like as things fail? I’m assuming some servers can keep up under the load and some can’t. If sh.itjust.works goes down under the load, can I still browse other servers? Or, do those servers think I should have some token from sh.itjust.works, because my cookies say I’m still logged in, and I can’t even do that?

Are there easy mechanisms to allow me to grab my post history?

I’m assuming most (all?) Lemmy servers are hosted in home labs? The idea of Lemmy excites me, but the growth pain that could be coming scares me. Anybody using a CDN in front of their servers? That could be good, but with unconstrained growth, that could be costly, which is very bad.

I can imagine lots of different worse case scenarios, but I’m curious what those of you who run servers imagine for the best case scenario? A manageable growth that just gets more vibrant communities, which can’t ever lead to the breadth and variety of Reddit?

Also, for those running servers, have any of you experienced issues during this growth? What scares you?

  • PriorProject@lemmy.worldEnglish
    31·
    2 years ago

    What’s the network flow like? I’m posting this to the lemmy.ml /asklemmy community, but I’m composing it on the sh.itjust.works interface. I’m assuming sh.itjust.works hands this over to lemmy.ml. How does my browsing work? Is all of my traffic routed through sh.itjust.works?

    • You register your account on sh.itjust.works, that’s where all the info you care about resides. Your list of subscribed communities resides there. When you read a post, it gets fetched out of the db on sh.itjust.works (irrespective of where the home instance for that post’s community is… when you read it it comes out of the database on your home instance), and when you comment on a post, that gets written to the db on your home instance. Your home instance a standalone fully functioning thing.
    • When you subscribe to a remote community like this one, you tell your home instance "keep up to date with posts and comments for this community and let me know about them. Your home instance asynchronously gets all those updates while you’re asleep or whatever so it can show them to you out of its local database when you come back. If more users on sh.itjust.works subscribe to the same community… there’s no incremental overhead. All ya’lls instance is ALREADY subscribed to that sub. So other users on your instance can sub to it for free, it’s already in the instance’s database.

    Assuming there’s a mass influx of redditors, what does it look like as things fail?

    • If lemmy.ml (where this community is homed) falls over from being overloaded or just is broken for whatever reason, your instance is unaffected. You can still read posts and make comments. This community however… is affected. New posts and comments for this community might come through intermitently or not at all for you (and everyone in the lemmyverse) because the community’s home server isn’t working well enough to reliably deliver them over federated replication. You can still read older posts and comments that have already been synced to your home instance, but new ones might not arrive. You might also see weird stuff like being able to see new comments from other sh.itjust.works users on this community, since those get written to your db before getting federated back to the community’s home server. But mostly updates from other instances stop or get unreliable.
    • If sh.itjust.works falls over for some reason… well… that sucks for you. You can’t log in or browse anything on it. You can still visit this sub at https://lemmy.ml/c/asklemmy/ as long as lemmy.ml is working and you’ll be able to see the posts and comments that other accounts make. But you’ll be an anonymous read-only browser, you won’t be able to post or comment until sh.itjust.works comes back online (or you make a new account elsewhere and lose all your comment history and subscription list).

    Are there easy mechanisms to allow me to grab my post history?

    There’s a github issue for this, but it’s not done yet: https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy/issues/506.

    I’m assuming most (all?) Lemmy servers are hosted in home labs?

    I don’t think that’s a good assumption. lemmy.ml is hosted on OVH, a cloud provider. My home instance on lemmy.world is hosted by admins that run something like a 32 CPU mastodon instance. Most instances with over 100 users are running on some kind of probably modest but “real” cloud instance. The admins are volunteers, but often smart technical folks paying for small but real compute infrastructure.

    The idea of Lemmy excites me, but the growth pain that could be coming scares me. Anybody using a CDN in front of their servers? That could be good, but with unconstrained growth, that could be costly, which is very bad.

    Anticipating growing pains isn’t wrong, it’s probably gonna happen. But the devs are gonna find and work on the biggest performance problems so that people can viably run bigger instances, and instance admins are gonna run bigger hardware and ask for donations or run patreons to cover the cost. In my opinion, the bigger worry is that Lemmy will fizzle… not that it will spectacularly explode. As long as people join and contribute and are interested, we’ll find a way to improve scalability and performance. The death knell would be if people get bored and leave, but compute capacity won’t be the problem in that scenario.

    • phase_change@sh.itjust.worksOPEnglish
      5·
      2 years ago

      Thanks. That was an incredibly detailed response that answers the questions I was asking.

      Doesn’t the fact that every Lemmy server has a copy of every federated post mean that if Lemmy takes off, only a few people with strong donation feeds can afford to survive?

      If there’s an active forum (sub-lemmy?) on a server that has to spin down, the history stays on the remaining active ones, but I assume the only option is forking?

      Moderation can only happen on the server hosting a forum, or each server can moderate posts in that server’s db?

      • Hexorg@beehaw.orgEnglish
        6·
        2 years ago

        Doesn’t the fact that every Lemmy server has a copy of every federated post mean that if Lemmy takes off, only a few people with strong donation feeds can afford to survive?

        Yes I’ve seen something like that on mastodon already. Though the caching is scaled by time so you can just say to cache only last 24 hours (or less) which will scale down storage requirements.

      • PriorProject@lemmy.worldEnglish
        6·
        2 years ago

        Doesn’t the fact that every Lemmy server has a copy of every federated post mean that if Lemmy takes off, only a few people with strong donation feeds can afford to survive?

        It’s not precisely true that every Lemmy instance stores every post. A given Lemmy instance will store a given post if and only if:

        • A user on the storing instance is “interested” in that post. Being interested has a somewhat complicated definition that I myself don’t fully understand, but two examples of being interested include being subscribed to the community BEFORE the post was made (importantly, the storing instance doesn’t fetch the forever backlog of posts just because someone subscribes… rather… it asks to receive FUTURE posts), or a user searches a post by url.
        • Subject to some caching policy. I just learned this today from another comment, and maybe it doesn’t apply to Lemmy, or doesn’t apply yet… but we already know that the storing instance doesn’t fetch historical posts going back forever. It could also decide to forget posts older than a certain time.

        The first of these is most important though, because it means that posts and comments that no one is interested in don’t get shipped around the federated network. And this leads to the property that the size/cost of a Lemmy instance is going to depend on the size of the “active” usage. A single user Lemmy instance subscribing to a handful of communities will always be small and cheap, because it doesn’t subscribe to much content. A bigger Lemmy instance need not scale to the entirely of content in the lemmyverse, but rather to the “active set” of posts and comments its users interact with this month. That could get big, but what the Lemmy devs are saying (sorry no link, I’ve read too many posts lately to remember all my sources) is that user-traffic browsing the local DB of the Lemmy instance is dwarfing the replication load, which is great news because user browsing is much easier to optimize than federated replication.

        If there’s an active forum (sub-lemmy?) on a server that has to spin down, the history stays on the remaining active ones, but I assume the only option is forking?

        (FYI, the thing you subscribe to is called a community in Lemmy. Some folks say sublemmy, but this is a redditism that isn’t used in the code or official docs. It’s a “community”, which is why the url for a community is hxxp://my.lemmy.social/c/mycommunity. The “c” in the middle stands for community.)

        Well, we’ve already talked about caching and expiry. It’s not clear to me than any Lemmy instance other than the one that hosts the community is required to keep the ENTIRE post/comment history (though yeah the active/recent ones will be all over the federated network).

        I haven’t lived through a major instance shutdown, maybe an old-timer can weigh in here. Speculating, I’d think there would be 2 options:

        • BEFORE the old instance shuts down (or using a third big community like !lemmy@lemmy.ml to coordinate), make a new community on a different server and the mods post telling everyone to subscribe there. The new community would be… well… new. It wouldn’t have the old posts, it would be made from scratch. The only things that would bind it to the old community are the mods that come over, the users that follow them, and the culture.
        • Optionally, using database tricks, or a migration tool (that I don’t think currently exists, but could almost certainly be created)… after doing all of the above… someone direct db access on both instances (aka an admin) could copy the the old posts to the new community. This might be a terrible idea for federation reasons, or it might be prohibitively complicated because of the db schema… but it feels to me like it COULD work. I’m not aware of it having been done before, or of any tooling that makes it “easier” for someone who isn’t pretty strong at doing complex data migrations in Postgres.
    • piezoelectron@slrpnk.netEnglish
      1·
      2 years ago

      I’m wondering if Lemmy (and maybe the fediverse generally) has the potential to offer incoming Reddit mods something Reddit can’t: compensation.

      Obviously it won’t be huge, but I feel like there’s a greater chance that a Lemmy user will make at least small one-off or even regular donations to help keep their communities and/or instances running.

      Like if I’m running a server, voluntarily paying $50/month as, say, the mod of a 20M+ user subreddit might, even if 20 users contribute $2.5, that’s a full month’s worth of server time paid for.

      As I say, the scale would be quite low, but wonder if it could be an interesting idea to try out, even if just as a proof-of-concept.

      • dogmuffins@lemmy.mlEnglish
        4·
        2 years ago

        There’s definitely scope for this.

        I know I would never pay for facebook / twitter / reddit. Not 1 cent, but I’m happily contributing to fosstodon on patreon each month - and I don’t think I’m alone.

        I think there’s a not-insignificant segment of the population that are weary enough of the advertising revenue model that we’re happy to pay to avoid it. The expectation that everything on the net should be free has ruined the net IMO.

        • CalcProgrammer1@lemmy.mlEnglish
          1·
          2 years ago

          In a maybe ironic twist, I’m more than happy to pay for sites that are truly free but completely unwilling to pay for “free” sites backed by ads, tracking, and corporate bullshit. I subscribed to the Lemmy dev’s Patreon and I sponsor a few open source projects on GitHub but I would never pay for Twitter Blue, Reddit Gold, Discord Nitro, etc. I want to reward good behavior, not support bad. I also supported Mastodon for a while on Patreon but when they changed the Mastodon onboarding process to make it more centrallized I pulled back on that. I don’t want to reward restriction of the openness the Fediverse provides, even if some subset of users can’t figure it out.

    • MigratingtoLemmy@lemmy.worldEnglish
      0·
      2 years ago

      Hi, sorry I’m late to responding, but could you clarify what you mean by

      My home instance on lemmy.world is hosted by admins that run something like a 32 CPU mastodon instance.

      What do you mean by “my home instance on lemmy.world”?

      You are correct, the real problem is if Lemmy will fizzle out and die. I have faced some problems such as screens loading infinitely, sign up mechanisms not responding etc. The best way would be for everyone to host their instance (a small one should be fine for individual/small groups) alongside the bigger servers. I would like to do it myself when I can.

      Thanks!

      • PriorProject@lemmy.worldEnglish
        1·
        2 years ago

        What do you mean by “my home instance on lemmy.world”?

        I mean that my account, with the username PriorProject is hosted on the instance called lemmy.world. So that instance is “home” for my account. When commenting on a community like !asklemmy@lemmy.ml, the home instance for that community is lemmy.ml, and I’m relying on federation between those two instances to shuttle posts/comments back and forth so I can see them and people on other instances can see my comments.

        If you were confused because we were discussing “home labs”, I confusingly used “home” in a different way. I don’t mean that lemmy.world is hosted out of my house (it’s hosted on a cloud provider, and I have nothing to do with running/hosting lemmy world… I just happened to sign up for an account there), I mean that instance is the home for my account. I probably could have found a clearer way to say that initially, but the ambiguity didn’t occur to me till you just responded.

        The best way would be for everyone to host their instance (a small one should be fine for individual/small groups) alongside the bigger servers.

        It’s worth noting that it’s possible to overtune a federated network on single-user instances as well. The advantage of a shared instance is that servers hosting communities can replicate posts/comments from that community to a server, and that server can handle browse traffic for hundreds or thousands of users. If each one of those users instead ran their own single-user instance, the server hosting the community would have to work much harder to deliver hundreds or thousands of copies of those posts/comments… and if some users went inactive but left their lemmy server running… maybe nobody is even reading those posts.

        It definitely IS possible to overtune a federated network both for too few servers that are each too big, and too many servers that are each too small. There is a goldilocks zone of a medium number of servers that are medium in size. But Lemmy is a long way from too many single-user instances (the devs have commented that replication traffic is not a bottleneck), and there’s also a lot of tuning they can do to make large instances run smoothly. So Lemmy has room to both host bigger servers, and more of them.

        • MigratingtoLemmy@lemmy.worldEnglish
          1·
          2 years ago

          Thanks for the comment! That cleared it up. Great to know that running a single-user instance won’t hurt Lemmy. I kind of wish the developers would have gone for k3s instead of Docker to self-host Lemmy but I suppose that’s fine for now.