• HadManySons@lemmy.bond
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Only if you don’t know what Cloudlfare does. It protects against all kinds of attacks.

    • foggy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah this post is nearly upsettingly ignorant.

      Cloudflare is just about the only big internet company out there objectively doing good things for the Internet.

      • danwardvs@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        This seems like saying road construction makes driving objectively worse or security guards make a stadium venue objectively worse.

      • spacesweedkid27 @lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Maybe their point is just privatisation or something.

        For example a dns provider like cloudfare just could artificially make latency costs for servers that don’t agree with something cloudfare does bigger, which would result in them being less likely to be displayed in a search result because a search engine would have IP adresses faster from other servers. This obviously depends on if a search engine makes dns requests or just provides hostnames for the end user.

      • planish@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Right now.

        But everybody is also moving into their castle. Many for free.

        They are not allowed to let people do that unless they have an argument that, somehow, this makes money for the owners of Cloudflare. Maybe that’s in the form of good publicity. Maybe they’re hoping to set up some tollbooths at the castle gate, once enough people are inside and the other options have withered for lack of customers.

        • foggy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          They have existed for over a decade wtf are you on about. They’re publicly traded and doing very well.

          This is more nonsense in a thread full of nonsense.

          • planish@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            That suggests they’re less likely to try to frantically monitize in a way that risks killing their brand’s reputation. Maybe they’ll stay nice indefinitely.

            • BoscoBear@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              Anyone providing services for a profit could pull a Unity at anytime. Still, I think you need more for the “slippery slope” argument.

    • KSP Atlas@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I dont like monopolies, but a world without cloud flare would go down constantly just because a few script kiddies decided to ddos something

    • RickyRigatoni@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      My negative experiences as an end user take priority over any positive experience told to me by a third party in a usage case that doesn’t apply to me.

      • Daniel@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Most of the time that a site is using Cloudflare you’ve likely not noticed and it has improved your experience.

        • taanegl@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          You’re all circle jerking around the problem. Proxy DNS and CDN’s should be decentralised into standard protocols and not centralised into one company, for what should be obvious reasons (privacy being one of them).

          I use CloudFlare on my websites and I feel like I don’t have a choice. The fact that it’s free to use proxy DNS is the kicker here, and the big selling point behind the DDoS protections. But the milliseconds CF DNS and page caching shave off page loads is also dangerous, because now it becomes mandatory if your websites are actually competing against someone else.

          Again: this is a single entity, a single point of failure and in effect a monopoly. We don’t just get to use it, we have to use it.

          Of course one can’t complain unless one has made an effort to do something about it, like I dunno, make a national version of CloudFlare?

          Mwahahahaha! Didn’t like that one, did you?!? Soon that will be mandatory and departments that investigate will honeypot your ass when they need a some justification for taking your in for a little private interrogation… wait, no, GO BACK!!

          Okay, so protocols. Hard as fuck, static as hell. Yes? But, decentralised. Si? DNS proxying and content caches are staples of the modern internet. Content go quick, content go real quick ya. All we need to do is figure out a way to facilitate those things without having to rely on a single company, government body or even access to the many nodes that comprise the internet.

          We used to write spec, damnit! We must return to the source. I have been some schmuck on the internet and this was my TL;DR.

      • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Your experience as an end user is only available because cloudflare exists. That’s why your end user opinion doesn’t matter, because bad actors are constantly trying to ruin the internet and cloudflare is the gatekeeper. As a server owner I need security at the door to keep our illegal activity. Your opinion of “I don’t like security at the door” is dually noted and immediately thrown away.

        • RickyRigatoni@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          “You only know about the bad thing because the bad thing exists” what a compelling argument. Did you know water makes things wet because it’s wet?

  • txmyx@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    What?? I thought cloudflare is good. Free Ddos protection, etc.

      • foggy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Only because no one does what they do as well as they do it.

        If they had competition, that wouldn’t be the case. Sadly, there are very few other good guys out there…

          • foggy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            There exists competition, they’ve just been doing it consistently well at a large scale for awhile.

            They’ve done nothing to prevent competition, because they’re legit AF. The competition just hasn’t put a dent in their market share because they’re excellent at what they do.

        • 30p87@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Well the admin of a site could opt out of using cloudflare for the time being, a user could do literally nothing. Errors in Cloudflare can easily take down their servers and therefore the CDN and access to like 20% of websites. And Bugs in Cloudflare can even leak user data.

          So cloudflare can grant DDOS Protection, CDNs and other exploiting protection, but can take down large parts of everything, temporarily or permanently.

  • primalmotion@lemmy.antisocial.ly
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    6 months ago

    I am baffled seeing so much cloudflare fanboys here…

    Cloudflare is everywhere, it sees everything, it holds everything, it has private keys for tons and tons of websites, it’s subject to the absence of any privacy law in the US, but they are “nice”. Wow.

    Google also was nice. It used to give you good results. Twitter also was nice.

  • InvaderDJ@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Honestly, I don’t know how any end user who doesn’t understand IT and wasn’t around before services like Cloudflare were available can say this. They objectively don’t have the information or experience to make the claim.

  • psycho_driver@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I hopped in this thread then shortly thereafter got redirected to a cloudfare bad gateway page. It’s a conspiracy.

    • RickyRigatoni@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      don’t listen to the nerds, cloudfare is trying to steal your soul and sell it to the Big Capybara industry.

  • Destide@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Literally trying to figure out if Cloudflare or tailscale would be the best way to go. The memes have spoken

    • RickyRigatoni@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Don’t use memes to make decisions I’m just mad I can’t use the discord app on my desktop, can’t download manga from nhentai without jumping through hoops anymore, and have to solve 5 captchas in a row when I use a vpn which is all the time.

  • 57lchlover@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Considering how I (try) to do bug bounties for money, it’s bad for that, but otherwise, it’d probably be worse without it, considering how it seems a lot of developers seem to totally rely on it for reflected XSS protection.