

Jon Stewart has actively said he would never want to do that - which makes him one of the best candidates.
Little bit of everything!
Avid Swiftie (come join us at [email protected] )
Gaming (Mass Effect, Witcher, and too much Satisfactory)
Sci-fi
I live for 90s TV sitcoms
Jon Stewart has actively said he would never want to do that - which makes him one of the best candidates.
Someone who doesn’t want it, who tries to refuse honestly. That’s who deserves power.
Don’t we already have this over at https://lemmit.online/?
Understanding their workers and excels at the simple things.
I worked retail in college and most of the managers werE constantly having arguments about scheduling with their employees because most were in college and had odd schedules. My manager came in and first thing they did was sit down with each of us individually to come up with our availability. She then did something inconceivable to the other managers. She made a set schedule for the semester for all of us. The other managers said “they’re part time, that’s not what they do”. Immediately tension with scheduling was gone. We also didn’t have confusion with why I had to work Saturday but so and so didnt.
Throughout her time there she made other simple things like that easier. Want time off? Just first one to ask for it would get it off. Christmas and holidays? We are retail so it’s tough, but she made sure everyone got enough time for families.
Of course then everyone had no idea how she had the best performing department and why her worker happiness, retention, and sales were up. Gobsmacked. Almost like we were motivated to work harder because of the simple respect we received
Gonna be interesting if that ai bill passed then.
For the folks downvoting, I’m 90% sure this is a joke on how stupid it was when Reddit added live videos
I’d like to see how they measured success. Was it to break even? Well from what point? Including the time that it was supposed to be a live service game? Through the committees and executives shutting down ideas? It was in the top 10 for games on Steam that week and had generally favorable reviews. If that didn’t match their plan, that’s on them.
Is it false? Even if it is dumb, here we are 15 years later talking about it. Still, after hours we’re still going back and forth about it.
Can someone ELI5? He’s admitting it was never truly open? Or they were wrong for thinking open was good at all?
I brought up a story about a red square, of which you are, 15 years later, still trying to convince someone that it’s not art. Something that is still being debated on 15 years later is pretty interesting, especially for it being just a red square. The more we talk about it, the more it legitimizes it.
Half of those “AI Executives” are just part of hype companies wrapped up in the AI bubble. It’s the exact same as the crypto bubble, everyone started some company to get gullible VCs to dump money into them. Now it’s popping. Congrats. Now we’re going to lose the rest of the internet as we know it because they wanted to make it rich quick.
Yet here we are talking about it.
Thank you, was about to rage
So EA put way too high of a sales target on the game, obviously held it back from becoming what it could be, and now are blaming the studio with layoffs, ensuring the next game will flop.
I don’t care what their “numbers” and “projections” were. The game was on the top 10 list in Steam. Even if it wasn’t an A+ game I’d say it looked like it at least hit Assassin’s Creed numbers, I’d hardly call that a failure. Sounds more like a failure to accurately predict, maybe they should fire their business analysts instead of the people who you know, make the games.
This is a very nuanced question, because art isn’t always about skill.
I remember I was one of those guys who thought modern art was stupid. My family took me to MoMA and I remember I was looking at a painting of a red square. It was a large 2 foot by 2 foot red square. I remember saying “but anyone could do this” to my aunt. She replied:
But nobody else did.
Stopped in my tracks and it clicked. The fact that they had done it, and we were there talking about it and discussing it, that right there proved it was art.
So it’s not just quality. I’m sure AI could spot out 1000 red squares, and some would consider that low effort, but no one would ever discuss them.
Reported
Ow his free speech is hurting me! Authorities!
So sendgrid checking does 2.5M emails a month for $90/month, and if call them the Cadillac provider. More than that you have to contact sales, so I’m still wondering how it’s that expensive to them
I agree. I love the fediverse but it is public by design, so anyone can listen. I think matrix is the obvious compliment to that. Many walls and closed doors
The Element X client has been much nicer for people I’ve found, and I’ve been “onboarding” users one by one making sure they get in and they can chat. I agree the verification is an annoying step, and all of the checks, I tell people that’s just getting encryption set up, proving that it’s secure. Once I get them going, they’ve been pretty stable on it.
The whole debate was the first time I saw Americans for who we really are. Whiney, entitled, and refuse to change for the tiniest, smallest of reasons. Changing literally one of the smallest things I encounter because it helps animals? Nope, gotta literally rage for weeks online about it
It’s how I knew we were fucked when covid hit. What, wear a mask? I think piece of fabric over my face? To help other people who aren’t even me?! Obviously this is the worst thing in the entire history of human kind!