• Saga@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      78
      ·
      1 year ago

      The striking workers are pompous, gilded aristocrats, we must break the strike and crush the unions so us poor common CEO’s can have a chance at a little fairness. Woe is me!

      • DarthRedLeader@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        43
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        In the interview, Huffman also praised the cost-cutting by Twitter owner Elon Musk, calling the reduced headcount there an example of how a social media site can be without the massive revenue of a company like Google.

        I mean, wtf

        • bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          28
          ·
          1 year ago

          calling the reduced headcount there an example of how a social media site can be without the massive revenue of a company like Google.

          My brother in Christ, you raised the head count

          • ElectricCattleman@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            1 year ago

            Right? It’s like wikipedia tripling their paid staff, then complaining that they aren’t getting enough donations to break even.

        • LawnMooser@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          19
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          He wishes he were elon musk, or that his company was as influential as twitter, but in the end it’s just a tool for open access forums and most users seem to dislike the site-wide policy and the disrespect for the free contribution to the site. Most social media companies would appreciate the loyalty towards those subreddits that both users and mods use to show, and in that regard those are the real value of the platform.

          The arrogance behind those messages seems to imply that he sees users as a product, and it is what he misunderstood: this is the true value behind the social media, the human users, the network effect and so on. So reddit is largely wasting this underutilised potential.

          Spelling correction

          • samus12345@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            1 year ago

            Users ARE the product - the trick is to make using the site attractive enough that they’ll stick with it regardless.

          • GrandMoffFartin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            Elongated has a rabid fan base built around what were perceived to be real accomplishments towards the betterment of mankind. That’s not true, of course, but he’s also actually wildly, wildly rich.

            By contrast I have yet to find a single person who supports Spez or even likes him at all. His accomplishments, real or imagined, are nothing. He’s rich but so, so, so much less rich that the contrast is like comparing our moon to the sun.

            This is like a kid with a plastic butter knife comparing himself to John Wayne Gacy.

    • Synthuir@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      49
      ·
      1 year ago

      He’s doing this on purpose.

      He’s repurposing leftist talking points into a pro-corporatist clusterfuck as an attempt at populism. He knows that there are a fair number of people and communities on Reddit that will be overall supportive of these politics.

      The idea is to get people thinking, “Yeah, I’ve heard that term before, it’s bad! And yeah, I’ve dealt with power-tripping mods before, so it must be true!” If they haven’t been paying attention to the finer points of the news around this (blackmail claims on C. Selig, gaslighting about 3rd party apps not wanting to work w/ Reddit, etc.), then this may be enough to get some people on Reddit, Inc.’s side. It worked for some people with Trump, for others with Musk, and with Huffman’s recent praise of Musk’s managerial style…

      • tal@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t know if using metaphors where the logical extension of mods being landed gentry is your product being a feudal kingdom, you the king, and the users the peasants is necessarily all that clever of a quote to start spreading around.

        • DarthRedLeader@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 year ago

          Agreed. The only problem is that I think most people will stop at landed gentry and say, “BAD!” without thinking through the full context like you just did.

          • Aliendelarge@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            Thats exactly what I expect out of a large swath of redditors. All this just to avoid the work of making the official app not suck.

      • bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        1 year ago

        The fact that he keeps making comments at all is so weird to me. Like he is truly terrible at PR. Every time he opens his mouth the situation gets worse for him.

        • escaped_cruzader@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          When a man becomes so rich and his “thing” so popular, he thinks he is smart enough to be an expert in anything all at once

        • nonfuinoncuro@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          Reminds me of SBF’s bizarre interview spree right before he got arrested. Or Alex Murdaugh that southern lawyer that killed a bunch of people and stole a bunch of money and thought it would be a good idea to testify in his own trial and got destroyed by cross-examination smh

      • funkyb@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        1 year ago

        ya my immediate reaction was “wow, how tone deaf.” It’s pretty clear to me that this clown is just repackaging the same talking points the VCs are using to influence his weak-minded ass.

  • fubo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    103
    ·
    1 year ago

    When a tree dies, it dies slowly. The heart of it rots, and then the roots stop growing, and only much later do the branches stop growing new green leaves. By the time the whole trunk falls over, there’ve been raccoons burrowing into the rotten heartwood for years.

  • Saga@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    92
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    So, by his reasoning isn’t he the ultimate “landed gentry”? He’s CEO simply because he’s been there since the beginning not because of any particular business acumen. Should we put it to a reddit wide vote to see if he should retain that title or be kicked to the curb? He likes votes, right? He likes democracy, right? Right?

      • Overzeetop@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        Following the true core of (his alma mater) UVA’s founder’s principles. He’s probably fucking one of the in-house supermods on the side, too.

  • SlingerOGrady@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    80
    ·
    1 year ago

    If I can’t win I’ll make my own rules…Jesus guy just admit you were wrong.

    Side note, did anyone see how /r/Pics handled this after they opened back up because it was beautiful. Around 2300 users voted to open /r/Pics again and 37k users voted to keep protesting in their own special way.

    • DevilsVice@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think that goes for all authoritarians really, I mean, post WW2 east Germany was the German Democratic Republic, which was anything but democratic under Soviet occupation. Fascists for sure, but don’t think authoritarian communists don’t use the same playbook.

      • Eldritch@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        While I definitely think it’s a bad idea to closely equate the two. You are not that wrong. Fascists are far worse. But authoritarians in general are not desirable. When those in control of absolute power feel threatened for their power the well-being of those underneath them goes out the window. It’s how you get waves of genocide under fascists. And dissenters under authoritarian leninist communism shooting themselves in the back of the head three times or falling out of the window backwards onto bullets.

        • MiddleWeigh@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Sounds like a people problem to me. We really gotta take better care of ourselves, don’t we? All of us. How do you ever stop this from happening? Where do we go from here? I guess that’s why the status quo is upheld.

          What a slow rolling machine we are.

          • Eldritch@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            It definitely is a problem of human nature to be sure. Absolute power corrupts absolutely. Most people just want to live their lives and don’t seek power. The few that do seek power generally should never have it. But we do need some minimal power structures.

            Part of the biggest issues is education. In western nations Political literacy and education is purposefully deficient. Because it benefits those in charge of the systems. Not to say it isn’t similar in other style countries. Ignorance is always a useful tool however.

            • MiddleWeigh@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Yep. There is an obvious malice for personal gain. I can feel it.

              I always narrow it down to education. But how. The ideology is so strewn about, by design.

              We’d need to teach stuff like mindfulness in school. Something that should be taught, but would be looked down on as some flavor of other. I wish I was taught to think and live. I was taught how to keep my head down and hate myself. This is just how it is.

              They really dug in deep. All over the world. Kudos to them for holding “power”, whatever that is. I can feel it before I go to bed, telling me what I’m not allowed to say aloud.

              People even pray to the ugly thing. Imagine that. Praying to something other than your own wellbeing and the wellbeing of others prayers.

  • Tempiz@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    68
    ·
    1 year ago

    I love the irony of him calling Reddit a democracy while also refusing to budge on the API issue. You can’t have it both ways.

    • FanciestPants@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Democracy for the volunteers while Spez maintains the “landed gentry” only for himself. This shithead’s lack of self awareness would be comically stupid if it were in any way comical.

    • Ryumast3r@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Also I can’t believe he doesn’t see how problematic voting for mod privileges can be. There’s a reason reddit has refused to allow users to vote out moderators in the past. If you allow voting, you allow outsidebrigadier, astroturfing, and also just petty mod squabbling. The solution reddit has always offered in the past was “create your own new subreddit for the idea you want and then get people to come over to it”. In general it’s worked. The existence of r/pics hasn’t disallowed other picture-based subreddits from flourishing, same with r/funny and, well, actually funny subs.

      Allowing votes on moderation just opens reddit up to a lot of shenanigans that I don’t think the admin team is ready for.

  • scutiger@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    1 year ago

    This week’s rebellion is a response to part of Reddit’s plan to succeed as a business

    Not a hint of bias in this article, is there?

  • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    1 year ago

    Hilarious that he wants democracy to get rid of mods, but he wants absolute power for himself.

    And tell me more how this will attract unpaid mods.

    • arnoldlayne@vlemmy.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think there will be mods either way. There are too many lonely people desperate for any kind of recognition and lust for power.

      What we’ll have to see if how that actually works out

  • DarthRedLeader@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    1 year ago

    So part of the issue with this “democracy” idea and making it easier to vote out mods is that Huffman has literally been found guilty of changing comments.

    That, along with the fact that we can’t trust reddit to not chime in with false accounts to swing the vote make me dubious that it would work.

    • gmmxle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ll start believing in Reddit’s commitment to direct democracy when users will be able to also vote out admins and u/spez if they don’t like their decisions.

      Until then, it’s just corporatism under the guise of some fluffy words.

      • SterlingVapor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s like when you let kids vote on what to do for the school faire.

        Not only will the teacher and school change the result if they don’t like the winning suggestion, you also can’t vote to do nothing or protest the event

        It’s just a way to give you the illusion of autonomy to boost engagement. It’s only a choice between the decisions they find (more or less) equally acceptable

      • MiddleWeigh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        Ya I’m honestly getting better more thought provoking content here and stuff I’d never scroll past on reddit cause you have to really narrow your interests down cause how much there is. So I’m learning new stuff.

    • BuckWylde@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve gone there a couple of times in the last few days to try to hunt down an invilte to tildes.net and it also feels like i’m doing something bad.

  • chaorace@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    1 year ago

    “I would like subreddits to be able to be businesses if they choose,” he said, adding that’s “another conversation, but I think that’s the next frontier of Reddit.”

    How ominous. This was an interview excerpt, so I have no way of verifiably knowing what Huffman looked like as he said this… but I’m fairly confident that he must have been rubbing his hands together and salivating as his pupils slowly morphed into dollar signs.

  • Kaiser@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    1 year ago

    After seeing what r/pics and r/gifs are doing I doubt voting would work out in his favor anyway. A surprising about of the user base is behind the protest.

    • MTO@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s just a matter of migrating them to a new platform. Lemmy has a small learning curve, but unfortunately it’s enough to turn off a lot of users. Hopefully with the influx of users, someone smarter than me can figure out how to streamline the user experience here.

  • Anon2971@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Is anyone else really entertained at this point by watching this pompus asshat’s arrogance single-handledly dismantling the pretty solid reputation Reddit has as a social media platform? It’s like I blink and he thinks “hmm, how can I say something worse to show everyone how strong and powerful I am?”

    I mean if Reddit’s going to go down, may as well go down in the most spectacular self-emulation possible. Solid alternatives are already formed and off to the races. Go off my guy.

    • jumperalex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      He just need to hold it together long enough for the IPO. Catch his pay day, and then Reddit can die for all /u/Spez cares about the rotting husk he’ll leave behind. Fuck him.

    • MajinBlayze@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I won’t lie, I’m kind of annoyed by the fact that the most active posts here are talking about reddit. Even so, here I am contributing to the “problem”