Different viewpoint and perspective from pcmag

  • Anarch157a@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    What they failed to mention too was that some communities (IIRC, it was r/mildlyinteresting) approved NSFW content that was only risqué pictures of vegetables, like fruits shaped like genitalia.

    This article is just a rewording of u/Spez propaganda. It wouldn’t surprise me if Ziff-Davis, owners of PCMag, are investors on Reddit. Condé Nast certainly is, which explain why yesterdays article on Ars-Technica shares the same propagandistic tones.