• blackstrat@lemmy.fwgx.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    1 year ago

    I dont see much advantage over Firefox with some extensions. Plus I’d rather support a non-chromium based browser as we’re dangerously close to ending up with the www == chromium only and I think that’d be terrible.

    • Phrax@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I now use Kiwi in addition to Firefox Mobile for this specific reason. No version of this can be too official (see removal from add-on store), but Chromium seems easier to sideload. If you know a current way to install xpi on android, I’d love to know.

    • segv11@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s not impossible to deeply fork Firefox or put a new browser around Gecko. After all, Firefox started as a radically reskinned Mozilla.

      This takes engineering talent though, and I don’t see anyone who wants to invest. Brave could’ve, but I suspect Eich had some hurt feelings which prevented it. So it’s just Yet Another Blink Browser.

      If Safari/WebKit loses its market share, the internet will become a darker, more proprietary place led by the world’s largest Internet advertising company.

      • blackstrat@lemmy.fwgx.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        The only reason I can think that people who want to make a new browser dont fork Firefox is because firefox can already do whatever it is they want to do in their new browser via extensions. This is only a recommendation for firefox in my eyes.

  • feduser934@vlemmy.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m not convinced. There’s already plenty of choices for chrome reskins. I’d rather they make their search engine better. Maybe get independence from bing.

    • Sordid@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Maybe get independence from bing.

      The only alternative to dependence on Bing is dependence on Google. Indexing the entirety of the internet is such an expensive project that there are only two companies on the planet that can afford it.

        • Sordid@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Huh, that’s a relatively new development. It used to just be a reskin of Bing, like DuckDuckGo.

          • Mogster@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            It started off using Bing as a fallback if they couldn’t provide enough results from their own index, then they ditched Bing entirely.

      • BootlegHermit@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        @Sordid

        Even then, there’s the theory/circumstantial “evidence” that Google’s indexing is a big farce. Forgot where I saw the video, but someone pointed out that the average person only relies on the 1st page or two of search results. To try to go beyond that, most searches very quickly drop from “millions of results” down to a few hundred/thousand at best. Going beyond the first couple of search result pages, the page count seemingly drops off a cliff.

        However, there are independent engines out there. The first one that pops to mind is Gigablast, which does it’s own indexing/crawling.

        If you’ve got some time to kill, check out some stuff related to the “Dead Internet Theory”. While I cant say how accurate the information presented may be, it certainly opens up the idea that there’s something funky about the internet and how we perceive it.

    • Blake (he/him) @beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s not a fork at all though. On macOS they use Webkit, and on Windows they use Blink.

      For web page rendering, the browser uses the underlying operating system rendering API. (In this case, it’s a Windows WebView2 call that utilizes the Blink rendering engine underneath.)

      (source)

  • crunchpaste@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I guess I could just search for it, but is this chromium based?

    Edit: The mac and ios versions are based on WebKit, the android one is based on chromium. I would guess the windows one is based on chromium as well, but cant find anything definitive.

  • Charlie@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    A lot of people saying this is a Chromium fork, but According to their blog, that’s not fully the case.

    What’s under the hood

    DuckDuckGo for Windows was built with your privacy, security, and ease of use in mind. It’s not a “fork” of any other browser code; all the code, from tab and bookmark management to our new tab page to our password manager, is written by our own engineers. For web page rendering, the browser uses the underlying operating system rendering API. (In this case, it’s a Windows WebView2 call that utilizes the Blink rendering engine underneath.)

    So it uses Window’s default web renderer. It just happens that the default renderer for windows is the same as Chromium’s renderer. In this way it does mean that it has a lot of the same problems as Chromium forks, but the browser itself isn’t a chromium fork. (This is also why the macOS version uses Webkit and not Blink.)

    • tinselpar@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Blink is a fork of Webkit. And Webkit was the original rendering engine of Chrome, before Google replaced it with Blink. So the DuckDuckGo browser belongs to the chromium family.

      EDIT: And Safari is a distant cousin of Chromium.

    • Charlie@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’d like to see if this makes an impact to the file size of the application since they don’t have to bundle all of Blink with the browser.

  • Tavirez@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    So would the “best” browser be Firefox? Because I hear Brave is good as well but isn’t Brave a chromium skin-esque browser?

    • Fell@ma.fellr.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      @Tavirez @somefool Firefox is the browser if you want no-bullshit and customisability. It works, and it works well. And you support the last remaining bastion against Google’s reign on the entire Web.

      • wsippel@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        There are also Servo and WebKit. Servo was kinda dead for a while, but the project was recently transferred to the Linux Foundation and revived by Igalia, with funding from Futurewei. Not suitable for daily use yet, but worth keeping an eye on. WebKit is of course used by Safari (which I guess makes it the second most used browser engine after Chromium), but also Epiphany on Linux. I’m not aware of any Windows browsers using WebKit. Fun fact: Chromium was forked from WebKit, which in turn was forked from KDE’s KHTML and KJS engines.

    • Aggy@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Thanks for that link! I’ve been almost firefox only for a few years and a reskin sounds really nice

  • Daak@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I really don’t get duckduckgo. I use firefox and all for privacy and cause it’s better, but I’ve found duckduckgo to be quite inferior to google’s search. Is there some nuances I just don’t understand about duckduckgo?

    • bquinlan@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Everything you do with Google Search is tied back to you as an individual, stored, and analyzed. They know what you searched for, how that fit into your search history, how long you looked at various parts of the results, which ones you clicked on, and what you did after that. That data is then used by Google to target you with very specific advertising. It is also sold to other entities that want to target you for marketing, demographics, and sometimes less wholesome things.

      DuckDuckGo does not retain any information about your searches.

      Google is definitely a better search engine, but 19 times out of 20 I can get what I want from DuckDuckGo just as easily. And on the rare occasions when I can’t, I resort to Google. That gives Google a lot less to work with and causes me very little inconvenience. Everything involves tradeoffs, but that is not a painful one.

      • Daak@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I get what google does, but I find the trade-off the be really convenient.

        A funny creepy story I have is that I used to use a specific video to go to sleep, and apparently yt’s algorithm got so good at figuring out my sleep schedule that it would start recommending me that video when I started getting ready for bed.

        • bermuda@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          recently youtube shorts started recommending me “alpha male” andrew tate videos despite me constantly ticking the “don’t recommend this channel again” posts and i guess in response spotify is now recommending me Karl Marx audiobooks

          • MoonRocketeer@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            This is hilarious. I hope their code is literally something like

            if (user.pref == hate("andrew tate") 
            { 
                user.is = "communist";
            }
            

            I wouldn’t even be mad.

  • yoasif@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Please forgive the spam – if you use Firefox and would like to join the Reddit diaspora from r/firefox, check us out on Kbin/Lemmy.

  • karbon@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    If I wanted a browser fork from another company I would just choose Mullvad Browser. At the moment, though, Firefox with arkenfox.js and uBlock Origin will do

      • karbon@feddit.dk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, LibreWolf is also pretty neat. I used to use it, but now I like the faster updates of Firefox and the ability to customize the arkenfox user.js to my likings. In the end Firefox + Arkenfox should be about the same experience as LibreWolf

  • JoYo@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    i just tried it, they have some baking that needs to be done before you make this your default browser.

    right now almost all JS is blocked OOB.

    edit: nm, it wasn’t JS blocking but the tab crashing.