Whatever use cases they try to push for social settings, I think Google Glass was still the better solution. Nobody uses their Vision Pro outside, and it’s way too expensive as just another VR headset to use at home.

  • udon@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    They don’t do that to allow consumers or hobbyists tweak the device in ways they want. They want to establish a functional ecosystem, so they need apps. Once it’s running, apple is the first to shut it down again and charge whatever they want

    • WolfLink@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      They don’t do that to allow consumers or hobbyists tweak the device in ways they want. They want to establish a functional ecosystem, so they need apps.

      Those two statements, allowing consumers and hobbyists to tweak the device in the ways they want, and having a functional ecosystem of apps, are loosely equivalent.

      I know the difference is you want hobbyists to be able to change more than Apple allows. But it isn’t a binary hobbyists or not.