• velxundussa@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Those are very good points.

    This specific source doesn’t highlight it and I don’t have the opportunity to find something else at the moment, but when I first heard about it ( in a ted talk that I can’t remember the name of… ) they had highlighted that health complications followed similar curves. The worsts of course being burning stuff due to dumping it in the air, but that most renewables had their lot of injuries too, that their just less publicized.


    Here’s my full take of nuclear/renewables

    My understanding is that most power grid depending on renewables need an alternate energy source for when power demands ramp up: they need some energy sources that they can tune depending of needs, at the drop of a hat.

    Hydro does that, you can let more or less water through. (I happen to live aomewhere where most of our energy is Hydro) Things like wind or solar are more complicated.

    As an energy appoint source, I think nuclear is a good fit for some use cases.