• fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      That was literally the point of this ruling. The EU only has the power to enforce things in the EU and they can’t force Apple to act differently outside of it.

      • nomadjoanne@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Yeah, I don’t think they read the article… Sovereignty only applies, well, in the bloc or nation.

      • Wanderer@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        Bit the EU could still go nuclear and just refuse to let apple trade I the EU. It’s not an EU company and it doesn’t make products in the EU.

        Financially it doesn’t care about apple being able to sell there

        • nomadjoanne@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          Ugh… I mean, they could, but the fact is I guarentee you many members of the EU commission and parliament themselves use these products, and they are popular in the EU, just not as overwhelmingly so as in the US. Ultimately, that wouldn’t really fly in a democracy and, as much as I may hate apple, for good reasons.

        • maness300@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          Great point.

          This is why Americans have no consumer protections; they’re the ones fucking everyone.

          • nomadjoanne@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            They’re fucking themselves. In the EU the EU, not the US, is sovereign. Apple has to follow EU rules, but again, only with the EU.

    • piecat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      Serious dumb question, how is it considered a monopoly? What forms the monopoly?

      The company? If so, what is the proposal? Apple HW team is separate company from SW team? Apple phones and Apple computers are separated?

      The app store? There’s only one Xbox store on the Xbox, one Nintendo shop on the switch or Wii. It wouldn’t make sense to require supporting competition on your hardware. Did N64 games work on the Sega Genesis?

      What is constitutes the monopoly and what’s the proposed fix?

      • nomadjoanne@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        It doesn’t, the poster just doesn’t like Apple (neither do I) and those are apparently magic words for “stop this company I don’t like.”

        • wikibot@lemmy.worldB
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Here’s the section for the wikipedia article you mentioned in your comment:

          Bleemcast! is an independently developed commercial emulator by Bleem! that allows one to load and play PlayStation discs on the Sega Dreamcast. It is compatible with most Dreamcast controllers and steering wheels, and leverages the Dreamcast’s superior processing power for enhanced graphics. It was created by using the MIL-CD security hole found in the Dreamcast BIOS.

          to opt out, pm me ‘optout’. article | about