So I thought The Creator was brilliant. I watched it in the cinema, thoroughly enjoyed it and was gobsmacked when I learned it’s budget was only $79 million. It looks better than some films I’ve seen that cost three times that.

But apparently, while it may make that back, it’s unlikely to even earn $100 million globally.

So the answer to the question of why Hollywood churns out the same shite over and over is that, currently, tragically, that is what the masses want to spend their money on.

And that makes me sad.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Cody Johnson put it very well when he talked about how movie executives saw that Barbie was a smart and funny movie with a good message and decided that meant they needed to make more movies about Mattel toys.

    Executives don’t even like movies very much. They just want to make money and they do whatever they think will make money, not make good movies.

  • Edgelord_Of_Tomorrow@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Shawshank Redemption was a book. The Godfather was a book. Lord of the Rings, Forrest Gump, Fight Club, Goodfellas, Silence of the Lambs… That’s just from the first 25 of IMDB’S top 250.

    The Thing is a remake. The Fly was a remake. Scarface, The Departed, The Mummy… all remakes.

    The problem isn’t remakes or adaptations, the problem is they’re shit remakes and adaptations. Nobody cares that The Batman was the 75th adaptation of Batman, because it was good.

    • carl_dungeon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      You’re not wrong that many of our favs are remakes, but OP does have a point that disproportionately more big box office movies are reboots or sequels than 30 years ago.

    • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Who has suggested that being based on a book makes it unoriginal? Never heard that expressed and definitely not by op.

      • legion02@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m failing to see how it could be original. You’re taking someone else’s idea and adapting it.

        • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s a different medium entirely. Not to mention the book version is normally quite different.

          Plus I never said my opinion or presented anything as fact. Just said I’ve never heard this idea. It probably strikes me as odd because perhaps the majority of movies ever made are based on books.