• sub_ubi@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Yeah choose one,

    • 12 websites written mostly by templates that are keyword-stuffed to sound like your question, and one might contain an answer in the 8th paragraph.
    • A response from a bot that’s unreliable, but extremely specific to your query.
  • SkyNTP@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I have noticed that the quality of results on Google and DDG and others have been declining steadily over the last few years, and I think this is mostly a result of click farms generally getting better at gaming the system. Genuinely quality content is just being drowned out by crap.

    ChatGPT doesn’t really address this. I also don’t see ChatGPT as a genuine replacement yet because 1) hallucination is still too big of a problem and 2) the value add of using natural language for queries doesn’t seem all that beneficial to me. Sorta like, how IF you are already used to a terminal, it will be faster or just as fast as a GUI for many things.

    The only real value I have seen from ChatGPT, is for complex boilerplate generation that is very easy to verify. ChatGPT is fantastic for generating regex, for example. Or poems, if you prefer.

    • usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Natural language kind of stuff can be helpful if you don’t know the relvent terms for something though I haven’t had too much luck most of the time with ChatGPT on that kind of stuff. Worse is that ChatGPT is likely to lead to even more SEO spam :(

  • Iwamoto@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I only use DDG to search for answers on the web.

    At the moment, CGPT is mostly used for building me small scripts. i’m not a great programmer, but i do understand bash script most of the time. so often if i need something done i’ll just ask CGPT to build me something and i think it only made a mistake once.

  • gzrrt@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yeah, pretty much (GPT-4’s a big upgrade over the default 3.5).

    That said, OpenAssistant is already really impressive for a project with such limited resources. Would love to see open-source overtake OpenAI quickly (which IMO isn’t out of the question, considering how quickly Stable Diffusion developed)

  • natebluehooves@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I wouldn’t personally use chatGPT ,or any language model for that matter, if factual information is the goal.

    DDG has been my go-to recently, but mostly because I’m jaded with current year data harvesting and such. The internet feels like such a hassle these days .-.

    • fluffman86@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Same. Switched for the privacy, stayed for the overall better results. Still hit Google for movie showtimes and some other functionality, but usually use DDG.

      That said, DDG gets most of its results from Bing, so I’ll occasionally use Bing search and it’s good, too. The Bing chatbot can be good, but it regularly will type up a whole response that looks exactly like what I want, and the delete it and ask to change the subject. If it types anything that it thinks is sensitive it just shuts down.

  • seirim@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Anyone else using Kagi.com for search? I’m using it as a paid user and it’s fantastic, no ads and no tracking and results are great. I use ChatGPT for “ideas” and Kagi for specifics.

    • limeaide@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      How come you feel the need to pay for your search engine? What type of searches do you do?

      • 0xc0ba17@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Less Google = better. The results are also better, and looking for stuff is a good part of my programming job.

  • awooo@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Not really (I wasn’t using Google directly anyway), I think it fills a slightly different niche than search engines.

    It’s good as a fuzzy search for the sum of public knowledge, since it can understand quite complex queries and point you in the right direction, then you can go to regular search engines to find more specific stuff.

    Bing was fun to exploit, but I don’t really see why it’s useful, it tends to always look up information which means it provides less of its own knowledge, I can do the searches myself better than an LM. Maybe it can provide more concise answers than all the SEO crap everywhere, but that can be avoided by searching on specific websites like reddit.

  • Percy@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    They aren’t designed to be right, they’re designed to look like they’re right