• chiliedogg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 个月前

    No. Instead they’re gonna have state legislature throw out the results of the election. Which they can probably do, Constitutionally-speaking.

    The State legislature pick the electors. Just because they all use a popular vote to do it doesn’t mean they can’t change the law in between the voting in November and the actual election in December.

    • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 个月前

      Ha, I’ve answered that two or three times to other people here!

      I agree that changing or interpreting the law to pick stricty conservative electors is their next strategy, but I don’t think it’s going to be as simple or successful as they imagine.

      Sort of like how they didn’t realize sending in forged documents was very likely to fail.

      • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        5 个月前

        Forged documents are illegal. Changing laws regarding how electors are selected isn’t.

        Heck - way back in 2000 the Supreme Court hinted at the tactic in the majority opinion in Bush v Gore, saying that the Florida legislature probably could have just selected electors directly after the vote.

        • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 个月前

          Actually, a lot of the fake electors tried to use the defense that there’s no specific law against fake elector documents.

          Colorado just signed a law that says fake electors are illegal.

          Landscape’s a lot turnier then it looks