This opinion is based on reading people’s thoughts on the internet and remembering what I was taught in my own time in school (where they essentially stumbled into teaching that humans were some kind of ‘peak’ of the evolutionary process)

I think people have waaaaayyyy too much faith in human intelligence and it’s leading to the destruction of the world.

1- People keep thinking a scientist or a ‘rich entrepreneur’ is going to come up with some magic bullet to save the world, if we taught more about how other animals have tools, language, larger and older and more complex brain structures than us - People might realize it’s similar to believing that dolphin will arise from the sea with some idea to stop climate change

2- we keep participating in these systems that have been created under the assumption that we are ‘making progress’. I would argue that the minority of human invention represents real progress.

3- It leads to undervaluing the earth and taking it for granted. We worship ourselves as gods (literally). Almost everything you have wasn’t invented by humans. It was the result of billions of years of selective design. Yet we teach as if things we harvest from nature were ‘invented’ by humans. In reality, we often have no way to produce or even of conceive of these things without a natural example.

Thanks for reading

  • Spacehooks@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Humans have a large range when it comes to intelligence. Saying the average raven is comparable to human child is a fair statment but I don’t see any other animal making monuments and going to space. I don’t disagree with your points only the title. Issues come from people not educated properly. Which I could argue is systemic. Eventually we may be able to do the things we see in sci-fi but I doubt any other animal will anytime soon.

    • 🐱TheCat@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I don’t see any other animal making monuments and going to space

      But these are weird ( and biased) ways to measure intelligence. I could also say I don’t see other species besides Cephalopods with a body-wide distributed brain network that can reform it’s entire body to mimic in a few seconds, not to mention regularly escape from entirely alien containment measures.

      Even the mention of ‘doing things we see in sci-fi’ is weirdly human centric. Like dinosaurs lived on the earth for billions of years. How bout we accomplish that? There was a book that explored this idea that species are obsessed with themselves by Dan Quinn called ‘Ishmael’. The whole book isn’t really about that theme but it’s got an allegory about jellyfish that explores it.

      edit: this is getting downvotes so let me ask another way:

      • if ‘accomplishing the things we see in sci fi’ (like say, going to Mars) results in the extinction of the human species shortly after, do you think the remaining species on the planet will remember humans as ‘smart’ or ‘obsessed with vehicles/exploration to the point of self-destruction’? If you could float above the remains of the civilization and make a judgement, would you think it was worth it?
      • Robbeee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        No animal shows anywhere near the range of neuroplasticity of humans. Humans can exist comfortably on almost all biospheres on earth and even space thanks to the technology we developed. Including the technology of language which features the word intelligence which we use for the way we grow and adapt. That’s what we use our brains for and what we specialize in. We don’t use our brains for sonar the way bats do, but that isn’t intelligence.

        Does that make humans inherently superior or give us the right to render the planet uninhabitable? No, of course not, and animals are smarter than many people give them credit for. But calling animal intelligence comparable to that of humans simply isn’t accurate.

        • 🐱TheCat@sh.itjust.worksOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Other animals have language

          Edit: when I tried to research the nueroplasticity claim I didn’t see the answer you’re giving. I saw sources claiming many animals have this and that rats have shown more nueroplasticity than humans

          • Robbeee@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Other animals communicate. Language involves syntax and grammar which only humans are capable of. That also has nothing to do with the fact that intelligence is a human word to describe humanlike capacity.

              • Robbeee@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                …although the authors do not claim that humpback whale songs meet the linguistic rigor necessary for a true language.

                Despite the “human-like” use of hierarchical syntax to communicate, Suzuki and his colleagues found that whale songs convey less than one bit of information per second. By comparison, humans speaking English generate 10 bits of information for each word spoken. "Although whale song is nothing like human language, I wouldn’t be surprised if some marine mammals have the ability to communicate in a complex way.

                Did you even read the article you submitted? I get it, you like animals.I like animals, even humans, some of them. But you’re comparing other animals to humans at the things that humans are demonstratively best at. Its like saying that cattle are sometimes faster at running than cheetahs and maybe we’ve been defining “fast” or “run” wrong. If you move the goal post far enough apart and select the outliers you can find examples of anything, but you’ve proved nothing.

                • 🐱TheCat@sh.itjust.worksOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  "Although whale song is nothing like human language, I wouldn’t be surprised if some marine mammals have the ability to communicate in a complex way.

                  Are you the same person who claimed they didn’t have syntax at all or someone different? Why claim that when they don’t have syntax, and then move goalposts to bits of information?

                  https://www.uw360.asia/the-difference-between-human-and-cetacean-brains/ Are you aware cetaceans have more lobes in their brain than humans ?

                  This extra lobe of tissue has something to do with processing emotions, but also something to do with thinking that we humans just don’t have.

                  This unique evolution of the cetacean’s entire limbic system, which is a combination of multiple structures in the brain that deal with emotions and the formation of memories, suggests that cetaceans have the ability to process more complex thoughts and emotions than humans. Since the system is so large in cetaceans, and the unique paralimbic lobe merges with the cortex, it is believed that the lobe may create a mixture of both emotional and cognitive thinking.

                  Humans are always comparing animals TO OURSELVES and when they fall short we consider ourselves better, but we don’t do the comparison the other way and subtract points from ourselves when we fail against animals.

                  I think this is my overall point and why our estimation of ourselves and other life on earth is so flawed.

            • Wooly@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              And it’s not like dolphins could learn whale language. Animal communication is very basic compared to ours.

              I think it’s undeniable that we’re the most intelligent and capable species on the planet and not just because of apposable thumbs. Maybe some of the smartest animals are smarter than the dumbest humans, but we have a huge range.

              No other brain works the way ours does, other primates and some dolphins/whales come close with their ingenuity and stuff but obviously millions of years behind us.

              • 🐱TheCat@sh.itjust.worksOP
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Yeah this is the attitude I think is harmful. You essentially have no evidence of your claims but you just strongly feel superior to other species.

                ‘Animal communication is very basic compared to ours’ is just a blatantly false statement. We know there are named individuals, dialect, syntaxes in other species. I think some humans are just ignorant of these things, which is the opposite of intelligence

                Also none of you seem to consider the extra communication abilities many animals possess around scent a mark AGAINST humans. We may use the most complex vocal language to compensate for our total lack of smell communication

                • Wooly@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Suzuki and his colleagues found that whale songs convey less than one bit of information per second. By comparison, humans speaking English generate 10 bits of information for each word spoken

                  I understand some animals, especially mammals like whales, dolphins, and primates have complex languages. But ours is still more advanced. They just have no reason for their language to become more complex when all they need to do is eat and mate.

                  Animal communication is very basic compared to ours’ is just a blatantly false statement.

                  It’s not, it’s proven in the study you linked.

                  And as for smell, I would consider that an ability/skill, not intelligence. Monkeys aren’t smarter than us because they can climb trees faster than us, dolphins aren’t smarter than us because they’re more adapted to swimming. Even cats aren’t smarter than us based on their faster reaction speeds. Intelligence relies on brain power.

      • Spacehooks@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Lol I mean it is an unpopular opinion you would think people upvote the ones they dislike. No one is disagreeing that other animals are infact integeligent. What people disagree is the level of intelligence and how to measure it. The path to destruction due to blatant incompetence may just be a step to something better like we saw during the industrial revolution. Humans are not the only species to shape and use resources but it is more apparent (at least at the higher end intellect) that we can reflect on our actions and adjust. Humans are moving toward renewable sources and more eco friendly practices but it just does not feel fast enough. Humans as a species in its current state only existed for like 10K years and permanently effected the planet in that time. No other species has even done that. Good or bad we left our mark which proves a higher level of intelligence in the a short time we have been around. To answer your question, I do think it is worth it if we can get to the point of sustainability outside earth. Anything short of that would make it a complete waste of the potential we were given because any species that would have the ability to judge us for our failure would have achieved that goal. I know I do when I play Stellaris :). Plus failures are always good lessons on what not to do for them. I wish our predecessors where better but now we have to make the difference. Thanks grandpa. Let’s blame on the lead.

    • Grimspire@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I like to think the first step would be to trying minor attacks to gauge the speed of humans fighting back. Such as sending a larger species to attack an important commerical tradeline. Sort of like if orcas started attacking ships in a place luke the gibralter strait. Starting with small sail boats eventually moving to sink larger vessels eventually crippling world trade by blockade.

    • Bonehead@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Why would they bother when they can just fly off into space back to their home planet? Of course they’ll likely thank us for all the fish before they leave, but as humans don’t speak dolphin it’ll just look like a surprisingly sophisticated attempt to do a double backwards somersault through a hoop while whistling the Star Spangled Banner.

  • Chickenstalker@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    Individually, we are above average. But our advantage over other animals is language x technology. We are able to collect knowledge, preserve it and pass it down to our descendents. This body of knowledge spanning 10,000 years is the reason for our supremacy. We are a proto-hive mind.

        • 🐱TheCat@sh.itjust.worksOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          Again humans are biased towards methods that use artifacts/tools.

          If you’re a whale underwater your whalesong is as good as the internet, but whatever its not a physical object and its a totally sustainable method that doesn’t require harvesting half the planet so WE DGAF, doesn’t count!

          • Soggy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            1 year ago

            Whale song is not as good as the internet, and we’re biased toward tools because the jump from word-of-mouth to written information was a colossal paradigm shift. “On the shoulders of giants” is only possible because we aren’t bound just by our living memory and traditional stories. Cultural knowledge aint shit compared to cuneiform tablets.

            • 🐱TheCat@sh.itjust.worksOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              I just want to pick you peoples brains at this point.

              • Humans have had internet for less than 100 years, whales have had sonar and whale song for millions of years, allowing communication and thought sharing over spaces humans weren’t capable of.
              • So then, were whales smarter than humans up until the moment we gained internet?
              • Internet can easily be taken away from you leaving you weak and helpless, whales can’t be separated from their internet.

              Human survival strategy is very min/max glass cannon right now - we are dependent on complex, unsustainable, rapidly degrading systems for survival yet feel superior to other animals for those very same systems. Seems profoundly dumb to me in a way we fail to see because we are so obsessed with our intellect.

              As I said in another comment, maybe it can be said ‘we are most intellectual’ species but its in a kind of rain man way where we lose other necessary wisdom about how to survive long term on the planet.

              • Redditiscancer789@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Your argument makes no sense because humans have been passing down oral history for ages too before the internet and writing. It was literally one person’s job to memorize everything and then teach it to the next “history holder.” That’s why we have such shit record keeping before we invented books. And why ballads and songs were also used to help memorization.

                However to a lesser extent books, but definitely the internet is far beyond a basic data aggregator. It allows instant communication across the entire world akin to telepathy, seemingly endless space for knowledge good or bad, entertainment, business enabling/generating, allows you to 1 way communicate with the dead by reading wisdom from some person 1,000 of years ago. You keep saying “well humans have a tool bias”, yeah no kidding because the tools we make LITERALLY CHANGE THE WORLD, for good or bad. I believe it was the phantom menace who so aptly put it, “the ability to communicate doesn’t make you intelligent.”

                • 🐱TheCat@sh.itjust.worksOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  okay why doesnt the oral histories of other species count? They seem to pass down tradition and behavior for just as long, and we cannot observe their inner beliefs about more than that. So why are you assuming only humans do it?

                  Cetaceans have a structure in their brain that we don’t have that MIGHT allow them to experience life as a group. That is different than internet but not WORSE just because it doesnt require an external tool. Why are you obesssed with a way of being that ‘CHANGES THE WORLD’ so that you go extinct?

                  We’ll agree that our ‘tool intelligence’ doesn’t make us wise at least

  • ThrowawayPermanente@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    Disagree. We’re by far the most intelligent species on the planet, but this is kind of like the AI problem - being intelligent doesn’t make us benevolent or immune to screwed up incentives, and it doesn’t automatically solve all coordination problems.

    • 🐱TheCat@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I might agree we are ‘intelligent without being wise’ but then I would say that THAT should be taught.

      Currently we function as the equivalent of the neighborhood mad scientist. Obsessed with their own ideas but actively destroying everything and everyone including themselves. Smart not wise.

  • Discoslugs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Agreed. Human intelligence is way over valued. i feel much of this thinking has roots in exceptionalism.

  • redhydride@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Good points. It is always good to keep and educate the ideas in context. Humans are the most intelligent species based on the ability to change the environment to suit us. Human intelligence have made us extremely adaptable to extreme environments as well.

    That does not mean we’re the best at surviving on an evolutionary time scale. Many species have us beat at that.

  • icepuncher69@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I think you are mixing up biologics with lack of cultuure. It would be far better to teach critical thinking (which they already do or at least did with me) so that kids learn to diferentiate dumb arguments with good ones. And they already do that in the liguistic class, (whatever is your countrys language) specially when they start teaching about news and the scientific method. But ill give you points for the fact that this is an unpopular opinion.

    • 🐱TheCat@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think you are mixing up biologics with lack of culture.

      Can you expand on what you mean by this? What does a biologic mean in this context and who lacks culture? Here’s the definition of biologics I know of

      FWIW I don’t enjoy being contrarian on this and I’m open to smoothing my opinion. Agreed that critical thinking is a crucial skill and more important than this

      • icepuncher69@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I mean that you are atributing an issue about people being dumb and having dumb opinions to the fact that they are humans in a biological sence and that humans as whole is dumber and therefore other species are smart just because humans can have dumb opinions. In my book that makes no sense and makes me think that its mixing up two diferent fields. Thats all.

  • Thorny_Thicket@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    What animal specie is the peak if not humans? Not saying humans are anywhere near the far end of the intelligence spectrum but as far as we know we’re still the most intelligent and special thing in the universe.

    • 🐱TheCat@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah I think I might also have a problem with the lack of understanding on evolution. You are not more evolved than other species.

      Evolution does not have a peak and it a constantly ongoing process. You can say that some things are more successful than others but you need a metric to measure by, there is no overall ‘peak evolved’ thing and in fact that statement makes no sense.

      Other animals on earth make up more biomass. Other animals on earth have lived longer than humans. Other animals on earth have more complex DNA. Other animals on earth have bigger bodies. Other animals on earth have bigger brains.

      We simply choose to look at tool use and ability to terraform because we are good at those things