It is endlessly frustrating that companies have universally decided that they won’t let people say “no” to stuff, ever. There are no longer options to reject stupid-ass new “features”, only postponement until next time you open the app/website/program. They’ll continue pestering you for the rest of your life. I realize that my frustration may be a little over-zealous, but we deal with these interfaces dozens of times per day and this is user hostile behavior. There isn’t really an option to just use another service or program, since the entire technology landscape has been commandeered by a few major corporations, and they all enact the same shitty things as a group.

  • SokathHisEyesOpen@lemmy.ml
    cake
    OP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    The LG terms are the same as the Android terms, FYI. So if youve accepted them on your phone, you might as well accept them on your TV. LG uses Google for their voice control. I read the thing when I got my TV and if I remember correctly, they’ll send bits of recordings from when you’re holding the button to Google for processing of the requests. It’s been a long time since I read it though, so they definitely could have changed it. The voice commands are one of my favorite things about our TV. Like if I want to watch John Wick, then I just say that and it shows me each of the services I have available that have that movie. It’s pretty rad. That’s one area where I conceded any privacy concerns for convenience and I really enjoy it.

    • verdigris@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Google voice is the first thing to get disabled on any Android phone I use. It’s like the biggest invasion of privacy you could imagine outside of agreeing to let them film you on the toilet.