• parpol@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    42
    ·
    19 days ago

    Who needs Windows? You need to use better applications. And if work requires Windows, this article still doesn’t apply because it is the company’s responsibility, not yours, and running on an unsupported machine is a security risk.

    • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      19 days ago

      Because of course there’s absolutely no program a regular person outside of work could possibly need Windows for. None at all. Not a single application. Not a single game. Not a single piece of hardware they’re using (like many laptops with hardware needing specific drivers that don’t exist for linux).

      Nope, absolutely nothing a regular user could have a need for Windows.

      • parpol@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        19 days ago

        I didn’t say all applications work. I said use better ones.

        As for hardware, less computers support win11 than Linux. You can run Linux on 40 year old computers, and on brand new computers.

        Ans this article is literally about bypassing the restrictions that were put in place to protect users with CPUs that have the specte and meltdown vulnerabilities. You’re safer on win10 even after they stop supporting it than win11.

          • parpol@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            19 days ago

            If you’d rather risk becoming a botnet node than to even consider using alternative software then you are absolutely using it wrong.

            If your computer doesn’t support win11, then switching to Linux before win10 ends is the only right choice. The other less right choices are:

            Stay on win10, Upgrade to win11 and disconnect it from the network and the internet permanently.

            The worst choice is do what OP did.

    • Famko@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      19 days ago

      I use Linux and none of the programs I need for structural engineering work on Linux.

      Trust me, I would totally ditch the dual boot if I could, but sadly, I can’t

      • parpol@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        19 days ago

        What are they called? What do you need for Linux that only works on Windows or Mac right now?

        • Famko@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          19 days ago

          Revit, Tekla, AutoCAD, the usual. I have tried out FreeCAD but found it clunky to use comparably.

          • parpol@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            19 days ago

            Try BriscCAD. It is very similar to AutoCAD and supports their files.

            Revit seems to work fine with Wine, and although wineHQ reports Tekla performance as garbage, that was a very long time ago. It probably works better now.

            • stephen01king@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              19 days ago

              Trust me, if you’re used to the AutoCAD workflow and UI, BricsCAD is just different enough that it can be a bit jarring and a huge drop to your productivity.

    • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      19 days ago

      I’m sorry but “you need to use better applications” is very funny to read when most of the time the Linux open source alternative will never be as good as the product made by the company that has hundreds of paid employees working on it.

      • imecth@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        19 days ago

        made by the company that has hundreds of paid employees working on it.

        You’d have a point there, if the company’s aim was solely to make a better product; it’s been increasingly about increasing their margins at the expense of the users, advertising as much as possible and buying out the competition.

      • sqw@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        19 days ago

        otoh a lot of the most useful and enduring software ever made has been made by volunteers in their spare time

      • parpol@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        19 days ago

        Except most big open source project are developed by companies, and only the tiny ones aren’t. This applies to all open source projects on all platforms.

        Also, most of them already are better. People just don’t want to change their layouts and workflows. And people also don’t value privacy, which if they would, they wouldn’t rate the proprietary software as half as good.

    • net00@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      19 days ago

      Linux doesn’t have several programs I use to control my peripherals, the mobo RGB profile, and GPU fan control from Sapphire. It also doesn’t have a proper AMD adrenalin as far as I’ve checked, nor firmware updater for SSD/NVME, and the list goes on and on. I also heard controlling high refresh rate displays on linux is a nightmare.

      If I want to use the gaming PC I built to its full potential then I need windows…

      The article is still dumb though, anyone left behind using old hardware should not go through the pain of forcing win11 to run. They all should switch to linux

      • parpol@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        19 days ago

        You usually don’t need proprietary software and drivers on Linux because of the great general purpose open source alternatives. Even on Windows, a ton of the drivers are actually useless and only bloat your system or perform invasive telemetry.

        Personally I don’t even use the RGB features on my gaming PC, but OpenRGB is open source and lightweight. I would probably use it over proprietary RGB profiles even on Windows. You should give it a try.

        GPU fan control is already available by default in most Linux distributions and should require no additional drivers.

        AMD always have Linux drivers. The Linux adrenaline driver is here: https://www.amd.com/en/support/download/linux-drivers.html

        SSD/NVME firmware updates should also already be supported by default in linux. With for example fwupdmgr.

        High refresh rate displays should also work out the box on the modern distributions. On Linux Mint and Ubuntu they have a GUI for it, but changing resolution and refresh rate with Xrandr also only takes one or two terminal commands. There likely is software to do it, but if anything I could write you a script that does it if your distribution doesn’t already have GUI for it. I had to write a script to adjust some of my monitors’ drawing area because I mirror, but my displays don’t have the same aspect ratio.

        • net00@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          19 days ago

          I have already looked up most of what you recommended, and I arrived at the same initial conclusion…

          • OpenRGB doesn’t list support for my Gigabyte mobo, or XPG ram (unless I’m reading this wrong). I need this to stop the default behavior which is rainbow puke
          • AMD adrenalin only lists 3 distros, and none of which I’d like to use (I’d prefer linux mint LMDE)
          • Plus I haven’t even talked about the apps (office for starters, then itunes+icloud which I use to sideload apps)