• TriflingToad@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    I don’t understand why people want immutable. I don’t know all that much about Linux but on my Steamdeck it keeps getting in the way anytime I try to do anything

    • winterayars@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      Immutable is fantastic in theory. Where it falls apart is having to basically rebuild the whole distro every time you want to make a change. It should be there your base distro is immutable, then any extra changes go on an additional mutable layer but that would be difficult to set up. (You’d need a package manager like Nixos or something.)

      • dustyData@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        your base distro is immutable, then any extra changes go on an additional mutable layer

        That is exactly how OsTree and other layering solutions work. Only Nix requires a whole distro rebuild.

        • winterayars@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          It isn’t, though. Package layering modifies the install itself. See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fedora-silverblue/getting-started/#_flatpak_command_line

          The big problem with the way ostree works is that installing things has side effects. Every item you install with ostree makes all future items slower to install, including regular os updates. This is a significant flaw in the way they designed it and really makes immutable oses less attractive.

          • dustyData@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            It’s not a flaw. Ostree is a last resort, you should be using containerized software. Layering a package should only be done when strictly necessary and not as the regular way to manage packages. If you need an overtly customized system, you use Nix or universal blue to design your new system declaratively and create your custom image.

            • winterayars@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              That is a flaw. Flatpak is great where it works but Flatpak doesn’t solve all problems, neither does any one solution except os level modification. It can be a last resort by it should be a last resort that works. The layering system could be put together such that you don’t get side effects of installing packages like that. It might be tough to fix but that doesn’t make it not a flaw.

              • dustyData@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                16 hours ago

                Please remember that no one is taking anything away from you. If you don’t like it, you don’t have to use it. Traditional package managing isn’t going away any time soon. You are safe. Others can have their preferred tech, and you don’t have to like it. It’s ok to have different tastes.