While Boeing did not specify what would be taken away from Thursday’s offer if it were to fail, Holden said that could mean cutting any number of gains, including canceling a commitment to build the next airplane in the Puget Sound region, backing away from a 38% wage increase or losing a 1% decrease in health care costs.

On Friday, some workers were heeding Holden’s warning. Sitting down for an interview with The Seattle Times, Holden had just finished a Zoom call with more than 500 members who questioned him closely about the new offer and his recommendation to accept it. He had told them about the risk of losing the earlier gains.

The response from those on the call, he said, “led me to believe … they’re looking to accept it.”

For sure, there are still Machinists unwilling to bend. Rob Davis, a 13-year Everett employee, said he’s still a no vote and dismissed the union leadership as “a finger puppet of Boeing.”

Andrew DeFreese, an equipment operator in Everett, said Friday he’s also sticking with his no vote. He wants to hold out for more paid time off and quicker steps to progress through the wage scales.

  • peopleproblems@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 days ago

    “The next offer will be regressive.”

    That’s not how negotiations work, unless the value of what you are negotiating for went down.

    That was a dumb play.

    • GBU_28@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      Well it’s an attempt to generate temporal scarcity.

      Offer good limited time only.

      It’s a big gamble on the “buyer’s” needs

    • Sarmyth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      It could go down though. The decision to move products away from that plant can be made and diminish the bartering power of everyone there in favor of more friendly negotiations at another facility.

      There is a breaking point. It’s just intentionally hard to know exactly where it is.

    • PugJesus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      Unfortunately, safety nets are so weak in this country that many of the strikers probably don’t feel financially safe extending the strike. Whatever they choose, I’m behind them, but there are definitely practical considerations here.

      • P_P@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        Unfortunately, safety nets are so weak in this country that many of the strikers probably don’t feel financially safe extending the strike.

        By design.

      • catloaf@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Union dues are supposed to go in part to a strike fund, to make sure that they can still pay bills.

    • bamboo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Yeah it is insane that such a large company that works with the military is allowed to be privately owned, it’s pure waste.

  • toiletobserver@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Been waiting for the latest CEO to shoot his mouth off. Only took him a few months. Stay strong union brothers, you have the power.