• sapo@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t think it’s a bad idea in principle, but what got me suspicious is that I couldn’t find the resolution anywhere on their page. From the only picture of the screen I found, it looks painfully low res:

      • MonkCanatella@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        lol but that’s one of the benefits. You ever try to lay down and read? Shit is uncomfortable. With one of these you could just lie on your back on your bed which would be an awesome experience imo

    • ch00f@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Also, a big selling point of e-ink is that it can be lit externally and match the color tone and brightness of your outside environment. If you’re blocking out the outside environment, what’s the point of e-ink?

      • PonceDeLeón@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Even while lit, e-ink appears different than a backlit screen. Being front lit, it does still mimic a book being lit by a light. Eye fatigue is a big talking point when considering backlit vs frontlit displays.

        • MonkCanatella@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          The difference between e-ink and digital screens is massive. I’m not sure how they’ll be able to make e-ink look good in these glasses though

        • ch00f@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m not convinced that benefit would hold true if it was locked to your head, but the details are still sketchy, so I’d be happy to be convinced otherwise by some third party reviews.