• Kalash@feddit.ch
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    61
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    You you’re writing up more time that it actually took you. That is fraud.

    • Signtist@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I’m not writing up anything. I clock in when my shift starts, I complete the work designated for me for that shift, send it out by the time it needs to be sent out, and clock out at the end of my shift.

      • Kalash@feddit.ch
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        64
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m not writing up anything. I clock in

        … same fucking thing, Einstein.

        The non-fraudulant thing would be to clock out when you’re done.

        • Black_Gulaman@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          22
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s not fraud, that’s called “working smarter”. Not giving us a raise to account for inflation, now that’s fraud.

        • Signtist@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          1 year ago

          Maybe it’s meant to be, but my parents taught me about deliberate ignorance, and I intend to use it.

          • Got_Bent@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            1 year ago

            Most shops I know of these days assign a labor time to any given job. You get charged that amount whether the mechanic does it in half the time or takes five times as long.

            Anymore, it’s an internal benchmark for mechanics to build on the efficiency of their own work.

            In my line of work, it may take me three hours to solve a client tax issue. I will bill for that accordingly.

            If another client comes along the next day with the exact same issue, but this time I know the answer because I researched it yesterday, so I can solve it instantly, should the second client get charged nothing?

          • dragnucs@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            It does not, or at least should not work like this. If you can do same work, with same quality in less time than average, then pay rate is higher than average.

          • Kalash@feddit.ch
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            1 year ago

            flat rate

            Obviously not if it’s a flat rate. But empoyment rarely is flat rate based. The contract are usually require you to work a certain amount of time per week/month.

        • Got_Bent@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I remember those halcyon days when calling each other Sherlock and Einstein was the zenith of insults.

          On the playground.

          During recess.

          In the fifth grade.

          • Kalash@feddit.ch
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            17
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Which seems appropiate since most of people in this comment chain seem to be teenagers who’s only argument seem to be “boss bad” and “work bad”.

            • orca@orcas.enjoying.yachts
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              A lot of us speak from experience… it’s not just some opinion pulled out of thin air and being reductive and dismissive isn’t solving anything.

              • Kalash@feddit.ch
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                1 year ago

                Well, surely there must be more constructive replies to that situation that just slacking on the job or wirting up fake hours.

                Like does everyone here work for Evil Corp itself? If it sucks so bad, quit. Find a better job.

                • orca@orcas.enjoying.yachts
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  If you’re in tech, it can be absolute hell. I worked at an agency that required 7 hours clocked to projects every day. Doesn’t sound so bad until you realize you still need to eat lunch and deal with random non-billable things that arise. Now you’re working a 10-hour day to appease the numbers, while furiously clocking every minute to every job. If you estimate 6 hours for a task and find an efficient way to do it in 2, that’s the expectation going forward—even for the devs that haven’t done it before.

                  It doesn’t sound terrible until you do it for a while and realize that it’s a fucking meat grinder. Instead of being gauged by your abilities and skills as a programmer, you’re quietly evaluated by how many tickets you can get out the door.

                  I have tasks where I might spend 6 hours to make the task take a half hour going forward. That’s value-added work and I shouldn’t be rewarded with an onslaught of new tasks because of that simply to fill a void.

                  I deserve to find some ways to keep my sanity intact until I’m mentally incapable of continuing to write code anymore in the older years before ageism starts shoving me out the door.

                  • Kalash@feddit.ch
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    I mean, sorry. That sounds quite horrid. But that just sounds like a really shit agency.

                    I do work in tech and I also have to write up all billable hours minutely. But most of the work I do is on internal projects anyway, so I have to write up the time, but it’s not billable. Paid work usually takes priority though.

                    But when it comes to it, I’m required to work 8h a day. Doesn’t matter what as long as it is what matters the most right now. And I could easily just keep it there and work my 8 to 5 if I wanted, not giving a shit.

                    But I actually like my work, most of the time. So I do. So when you have to solve a lot immediate problems, the internal projects often get delayed and you risk overshooting the deadline. That’s bad for the company in general, so best to avoid it. That gives incentives to solve everything asap and still get the internal stuff done on time.

                    And if we risk falling behind the deadline, that means overtime (voluntarily of course), but all of our devs know that missing a deadline could set us back quite far, so everyone shows up. Of course all overtime is paid and at better rates. Hell, I’ll sometimes do overtime just to get the better rate and get ahead of things I’d have to fix eventually anyway.

                    And the boss very much appriciated the effort we put in. In fact, he makes less money then me. I know that because I’m a shareholder and can read the yearly financial report, they gave all the senior devs a share when the company went public.

    • Notyou@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Most employers pay you to be on standby for last minute tasks. That’s what you are doing for the rest of the time. You are also planing on how to do these tasks more efficiently. That is all billable in my opinion.

        • PerogiBoi@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          No unequivocally, you’ve shown us you fundamentally lack intelligence. You’re all over this thread accusing people of fraud for working smart.

          You are under the delusion of meritocracy, that good workers get rewarded for being more efficient than their coworkers. If you actually worked an office job ever in your life, you’d realize very quickly that this is not a dynamic that exists there.

          Instead, you accuse everyone here of being a teenager. I wager you’re actually the teenager because it takes someone with exceptionally little life experience to have the opinions you have.

          Hope your days as pleasant as you are!

          • Kalash@feddit.ch
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Alright then. Good luck with your childish “bare minimum mondays” attitude in the real world. Hope you get fairly rewarded for all that “hard work” you’ll clearly be doing.

    • Nora@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Imagine caring about stealing from a thief.

      They’re just stealing back a fraction of what is being stolen from them.

      • severien@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Stealing from a thief is still a crime.

        BTW, if they’re a thief, report/sue them. Or are they just “thief” because of an ad hoc moral system you made up to justify anything you do?

        • Nora@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Wage theft is one of the least acted upon crimes. This system is immoral, and the people who run it are immoral. Thinking you will get any justice except for what you take for yourself is naive and wrong.

          This system isn’t designed for us, its literally designed for the people its named after… Capitalists. Taking anything you can back from them is perfectly fine.

          • severien@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I grew up in a communist country, and we had a saying “if you don’t steal from your employer, you’re stealing from your family”. And people acted accordingly.

            You would love that! Or perhaps not, it actually sucked for everybody.

            • Khotetsu@lib.lgbt
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Wage theft (when employers don’t pay their employees what they’re owed) in the US accounts for more stolen value every year than grand theft auto, larceny, petty theft, and breaking and entering combined. Yet wage theft is not considered a crime.

              It’s the same story all over the world. The real issue isn’t the economic system but rather greedy people in positions of power with no accountability.

              • severien@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                The original comment did not suggest any wage theft happening, and the original comment from the communist commando treated all employers as thieves.

      • Kalash@feddit.ch
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        15
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Yes, because every single empoyeer is a thief. Capitalism bad, mkay. Fucking tankies.

        • CommanderM2192@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Get a real job. You obviously have never had one if you think most employers don’t “steal” to some degree or pay fair wages.

          • Kalash@feddit.ch
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            10
            ·
            1 year ago

            Maybe you should have gotton some qualification or had a better work ethic and you wouldn’t be stacking boxes at Amazon.

              • Kalash@feddit.ch
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                I didn’t even know what his job is, I invented it. And I’m pretty sure all boxes at Amazon are stacked by robots, so it’s not even a real job.

                • Catchphrase@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Amazon is still very much fueled by human labor. “Warehouse Associate” would be the job title. It is definitely a “real job,” and the people grinding their joints into dust deserve so much more dignity (and compensation) than Amazon, and society as a whole, really, deigns to give them.

                  • Kalash@feddit.ch
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    They really do. I know the South Park episode.

                    You guys should have like union or something, where a bunch of workers bands together to demand better conditions and so on.

        • Nora@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Imagine thinking capitalists deserve anything other than being kicked to the curb. Workers do everything, the sooner we control things the better.

        • irmoz@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah, that’s exactly what they said… can you refute that surplus value is extracted through exploitation of labour forces? No? Didn’t think so. Much easier to insult and deride, and pretend that was a meaningful or valuable argument, than to actually make one.