• rhythmisaprancer@moist.catsweat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    17 hours ago

    I wasn’t in middle America, but experienced the same thing. I still don’t understand it. Is it just populism? If so, not good. I definitely shed friends in 2016.

    • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 hours ago

      It’s populism, but it’s a populism of “things definitely aren’t good and need to change”. Hope worked as a democratic message, the dems were seen as the less corporate party, then the reps ran a right wing populist while the dems ran a former first lady who wasn’t acknowledging their needs and fears. The current situation has become one in which the dems see every election in terms of social issues because they don’t see the reality: they’re the party of “we need adults to govern” and the reps are the party of emotive grievance. The dems can’t win the bigot vote by being bigoted enough. But they can win the frustrated vote by running on a platform of reasonable and solid change by those committed to it. But if they di they lose the billiojsires to the fascists.

    • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      44
      ·
      17 hours ago

      It’s because Trump advocates for change. Now it’s not good change but he’s definitely not a fan of the status quo, which gets you votes when the other guy is a Democrat centrist beholden to status quo-loving corporate donors.

    • Alex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Populism boosted by new media (internet) vs. lobbyism striving to maintain status quo.