• uis@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    22
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Say what you can about communism, but you clearly see that capitalism is so much worse.

    • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      lol and I say this as someone who grew up in Soviet occupied eastern europe. Trust me, there are very few systems worse than communism, well at least, that version of it.

    • TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      15 hours ago

      Communism lifted an illiterate nation of serfs into an industrial and atomic super power in, like, 50 years.

      Which is to say just as bad as capitalism but approximately four times faster.

      • TrueStoryBob@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Heard someone say that their grandparents who left the USSR during the collapse in the early 90’s told them something along the lines of “not everything the Soviet government promised us about communism was true, but everything they told us about capitalism is true.”

      • Syrc@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 hours ago

        I don’t think any of the nations who call themselves “communists” can actually be considered communist. Hell, most of them are pretty much dictatorships, which is the farthest you can get from communism.

        • Dasus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          If were gonna start arguing semantics though, then what is pure capitalism? As even the US has limits on what capitalist shenanigans they draw the lines on. Ie policies like antitrust laws, which are explicitly to prevent monopolies, because while capitalism strive for monopolies, monopolies also usually kill the market so…

          The answer is obviously socialism when defined as the government owning or regulating the means of production, meaning just regulation is enough no need to own them.

          Communism doesn’t work yet because we can’t seem to plan resources use for large economies as efficiently as organic markets do it.

          But unregulated markets just destroy themselves, end up overexpensive enshittified adfests trying to push subpar products to you that won’t last you even the walk home.

          Capitalism is like the cancerous form of market economies.

          And communism has historically been about as healthy as the vegan diet of a nutritionally uninformed anemic teenager. Its not bad as an idea, but market economies just work better when they’re properly regulated.

          I’d definitely argue with you that countries like China aren’t actually communist.

          https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/capitalism-with-chinese-characteristics/CECD36DB2C3623DEE4670F7897BAA3CB

      • pythonoob@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 hours ago

        It was also responsible for the highly anti-intellectual culture that existed and still continues in said country today. So it swings both ways.