• tomatopathe@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Ukraine needs to get within artillery range of certain major logistical hubs to hamper Russian reinforcement and supply via the southern corridor. And it is close, now. The Russian administrators of Melitopol have already abandoned the place.

    With ATACMS, this would have been easier, fyi.

    Only people who don’t understand the situation repeat the sort of thing you are claiming.

    Furthermore, the US aid to Ukraine was mostly stuff that was destined to be decommissioned. The “billions of dollars” is on paper, not in fact. Nothing Ukraine is receiving from the USA is current gen or in use by the US and therefore isn’t diminishing the US armed forces. Arguably it’s actually increasing US strength, since the USA is now ramping up artillery shell production.

    From a strategic standpoint, destroying the Russian military (estimated around 50% of Russia’s MBTs and Airforce) in exchange for stuff you weren’t going to use anyway is a bargain.

    • usernamesaredifficul [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      no one wants them to hit those places with artillery if the Ukrainians start using American artillery on Russian cities the Americans will have kittens

      Russia has nuclear weapons which means there is a line that can’t be crossed with regard to dealings with them

      • GivingEuropeASpook [they/them, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s all about plausible deniability. The US didn’t want to arm them with anything that could reach Moscow and hit Russian territory in general, but the Ukrainians have developed the ability to do so on their own, so now US officials I think are more willing to discuss these things, since it can’t be directly traced to them (since now Russia can’t prove it was specifically American armaments or equipment used whenever it gets hit inside it’s territory).

    • UnicodeHamSic [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      You do realize that increasing us strength and military spending are bad things right? That just means more death and misery to thr world in general and US residents aslo?

      • tomatopathe@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes, we should just let China and Russia run roughshod over everyone.

        TBH, if the military just did some proper accounting and auditing, it would save a ton of money and be just as efficient.