Yes, I’ve read many posts the current state of reddit. But today, somehow I thought it can’t be that bad if I just go looking for some funny videos.

Boy, was I wrong. This post was at the top of my feed, and briefly scrolling through the comments got me out of there without looking at anything else ☠️

Oh, well, I tried…

  • merridew@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    When it’s used like that it is.

    You wouldn’t describe a man as “a male”, and you wouldn’t refer to your mother as “a female”.

    • osmn@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I certainly would and do describe people by “male” or “female” daily, along with everyone in the military, and anyone else that isn’t afraid of words.

      • merridew@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        “Female” as an adjective isn’t the problem. The problem is “female” as a noun.

        You can describe a person as being female all you like, but if you start calling them “a female” & defined purely in terms of the existence of their sex organs, you’re in the wrong.

        • osmn@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Absolutely, just the issue isn’t with the word “female” or “male”, it’s with the objectification and sexualization. We don’t have to vilify a word because it describes the subject of undue sexualization. “Person” or “human” could also be used, but I’d bet nobody would raise a stink about that.

          If it were a slur or something, that’d be completely different, but this is just a term that people don’t use on a normal basis, unless they’re part of a smaller group (military, science, maybe ESL) that does use it more than the general populace. Just because you’re not used to it, doesn’t make it wrong. Vilify the person, not the normal language they use.