whines about reductionist rhetoric, uses insanely reductionist example
whines about reductionist rhetoric, uses insanely reductionist example
That’s what our impulses tell us to do, but you’re not obligated to listen to every impulse. The complexity of life as we experience it affords us the luxury of choice.
I hurt my dick today
To see if I still feel
I focus on the bread
The only puss that’s real
They could both be untrue. Or only one of them. They could even have different degrees of truth. So many options, such little time.
Do you mean that worrying about someone’s hairstyle is completely outside of the scope of- and detrimental to the resources of- education? Or that someone’s specific hairstyle can be detrimental to the quality of education received itself?
sky gramps is into all of this already
or three stools in a trenchcoat
You would trust your lungs to vehicle manufacturers getting every van air-tight with seals to last for many years?
Typically that’s around when the bed gets big enough to haul a sheet of plywood or drywall safely.
I said nothing about safety.
The tests have determined that was a lie
Nice to see you’ve realized it’s a compromise and not some slam-dunk about the character of whoever’s driving it based on no additional information.
That being said, truck bros can be as insufferable as anyone else with an ego, they’re just easy to pick on
So edgy.
What if you rest the wood on the tailgate, or lean it on the roof, then tie it down, is it no longer safe?
What if you’re the driver for a small crew that picks them up every morning then uses the smaller bed for supply runs?
Just lemmy grasping at straws to put everyone into a box based on incomplete information.
I could probably still cook a better version of either of those 🤣
Apples to apples, those vans are more expensive and larger. At what point does it become ok to have an open bed? There are valid pros and cons in every choice being talked about, here.
wtf is wrong with our society…
i wish i was on the fios instead