Make sure your kids are carrying so they can protect themselves incase some kid is carrying. 🤡

Now even our Gloriously Orange Saviour’s lawyers are spouting FAKE NEWS! Bunch of LINOs!

There’s no bond! There’s no judgement! Some very smart folks are saying there may not even be a legal system! Have you ever actually SEEN a judge?

Fear not, our Incredibly Patriotic and Stable Genius is still running the show from Truthy Social.

Ok, hopefully that’s everyone inoculated.

“Oh, just one more thing…”

The scientific spirit at work!

Yay!

Bibi, welcome to the other side of US foreign policy!

I’m just nice so I have a lot of friends. A lot. I’ll stick up for them and they’ll stick up for me. Don’t mess.

It’s so fucked up, the tv show Law & Order did a spinoff in Canada.

Specifically, he is the Donald’s anal worm, feeding on half digested Big Mac’s and hemorrhoids🍔🩸🪱

(oh, and lies)

SCROTUS

The R is for regressive. It does too fit there.

He’d rather wriggle a bit further up Trump’s ass. I mean, he had a brush with conscience a while back, but it’s warm and cozy up there and consequences are scary.

I not familiar with that specific version of the saying, no.

The devil is probably surrounded by assholes and is one themself. So I’m not sure how it’d apply.

Any other questions?

How ironic.

Get thee behind me, Auld Clootie. You can’t fool me.

Is that what I’m doing? Why do you keep responding?

What you’re doing lacks the coherence to even be called ‘projection.’

FAAAAAMILY VAAAALUUUUUUEEEES

I would feel like you answered my substantive response with a question about breakfast, and given your track record on analogies I thought I’d just skip the part where I try to figure out if it makes sense and ask you the answer directly.

You’re one of these people who seems to think the world works how they think it should work.

How would YOU feel?

I one heard ast describe Linux’s code quality as ‘marginal’ (presumably speaking of the kernel)

Of course, it was ast talking at BSDCan but still, harsh words from a master.

No I rejected it on the basis that fraud is currently illegal.

It doesn’t matter if it remains illegal. You get tried for things that are currently illegal. If they decide to repeal those laws about investor fraud, then your comparison to pot users makes sense. AFTER they repeal those laws Donald might be able to seek some recourse. And right after that you can kiss the economy goodbye, since it’s all built on investor confidence.

And saying that some states have ‘legalized fraud’ basically shows that you don’t understand or accept the legal definition of fraud.

My God, are you literally this stupid or are you being paid to pretend you are?

No and no

They key phrase is “they made it… legal.”

Your thought exercise is about something legal that used to be illegal. Has fraud suddenly become legal? No? So what’s your point? Your ‘lying on a resume’ example made more sense, even if it was ridiculous.