![](https://media.kbin.social/media/9d/7f/9d7fc372a92e1ddc84de31485b415f7f8d3048a6f636bd7112ededd996e67fe3.png)
![](https://beehaw.org/pictrs/image/c0e83ceb-b7e5-41b4-9b76-bfd152dd8d00.png)
This, the very first sentence of the article describes social media as an accelerant rather than a root cause too
She/They • 19 • HUGE nerd lol • ND
Matrix: @cybercatbytes:matrix.org
Discord: cybercatbytes
(Best viewed on original instance)
This, the very first sentence of the article describes social media as an accelerant rather than a root cause too
It’s so painfully obvious that the article was written to push a personal agenda rather than objectively address the topic
Mozilla’s response brings it up along with other things that’d prolly get messed up too
https://github.com/mozilla/standards-positions/issues/852#issuecomment-1648820747
“The WEI experiment is part of a larger goal to keep the web safe and open” I’m guessing the openness they’re referring to doesn’t apply to everyone given that their proposal would likely negatively affect assistive technologies a lot of disabled people rely on? Haven’t seen them address that
“This thing is bad because I don’t like it”
Buuuut aren’t they still kind of pushing the chat control proposal? Feels they’re going both forward and backward