Good point and well said. The law in CA only applies to buildings with at least 15 units, it’s opt-in so landlords will only have to pay for tenants who opt for it, and there are provisions for canceling the service for tenants who don’t pay (then restrictions on their ability to opt-in again). That should help mitigate the impact to mom and pop shops.
I somewhat disagree, because landlords have a say by their sheer number and capital. If credit agencies or reporting services want to gouge landlords, that shouldn’t be the tenant’s problem and landlords should come together to negotiate lower prices. I much prefer the built-in tenant protection here of a $10 per month cap.
CA landlords can charge their monthly cost or $10, whichever is less.
Listen for the tiny screams.
Alternatively, install OBS and record your screen playing the episode.
Worked for me. Highly recommend.
I have a lot of unhoused neighbors so I regularly leave out fresh socks, a pair of gloves here and there, basic toiletries, and food for their pets. If one came to my door I’d be happy to try giving a haircut, but no refunds.
No joke, in certain instances of my profession a few billion is a rounding error. Real money numbers today are fucking enormous.
All the coolest people dab, often and without irony.
“Beryl? Even our Hurricanes are gender non-binary now.”
That’s what he said in response to the National Hurricane Center posting the latest satellite image of the storm.
It’s not nonsense. It’s a sustained attack on both people and science. This kind of message brings the science deniers and bigots closer together, helping to shore up that base and give it common ground.
And dab some cold water behind your ears.
If you haven’t read this about the Troubled Teen Industry, you should.
Often scammers don’t want to make it less obvious. If it’s obvious and the mark falls for it, it’s a good indicator they’re on the hook and will fall for more. It’s to filter out the less gullible so the scammer doesn’t waste their time. Probably not the case with this situation specifically, but it holds true in general with scams.
Instrike birdmance
Bad title, if the article is accurate. What’s happening is they are trying to repeal an exemption made in 2020 to existing anti-mask laws that were instituted to curtail secret societies and the KKK.
It does not appear that masking for health reasons was prosecuted before the exemption was made for covid. Would it be prosecuted now though is the question.
Generally? Yes. Specifically? No.
Couple of screws on either side for the sliding problem. Bedazzling to make it fun.