99% of stats are wrong.

Old news. Already seen half a dozen posts about this yesterday

Off to check if ‘civil war in the USA’ is on my bingo card.

About as close as we are to nuclear fusion. AI generation of shit will always be one step ahead of AI detection

I saw the original post in TIL, not in a political community where it may be (slightly) more acceptable. It’s never ok to divert reports of criminality away from the authorities and towards political organisations. And listing a bunch of phone numbers of a political organisation without stating their affiliation is misleading.

Read the top comment by Mox.

I have not googled them all, i don’t care enough, but the ones i checked are democrat offices. And votesaveamerica is a democrat PAC

I thought about reporting it, but not sure if it meets the criteria to be deleted so added my views to that post instead. Edit: sod it, i reported the other post

Thank you, good work.

By learned you mean found it on facebook or x and applied zero critical thinking before posting it here? It’s from a democrats aligned organisation and lists phone numbers of local democrat offices. So it’s bad advice, they are not independent or impartial. (And just to be clear: i don’t have a vote in this election)

This suggests they are far from independent. Go with the advice above people. Edit: i cannot find the hotline page anywhere on their site.

Unfortunately not on ios, but thank you

Paywalled link

Thanks for the non-paywalled article. It produces absolutely no evidence though. or even an explanation or theory. One mention of benzene, which is a well known dangerous substance, but also highly flammable. So unlikely to be produced by burning any gas, and no link to a source. So that sounds like scaremongering to me. If anyone knows how to make benzene out of methane, let me know and we’ll patent the process. The one link to ‘research’ is one that just shows correlation, not causation.

Go touch a cow. How hard is it to check a dozen fraudulent votes and work out who these votes were for. I’m willing to bet they are not for ‘both sides’

Voyager on iOS has keyword filters

You should read up on non verbal communication. As an older boomer, I am perfectly happy with working from home and a catch up on zoom/teams/slack with my team 99% of the time, and very much against return to office. But sometimes I do need face to face communication with team members I’m concerned about, or with customers.

Not a word on what it is or how it works. Marketing hype most likely.

I don’t disagree, but it’s probably not that easy. Universities in my country don’t have the resources anymore to do many orals, and depending on the subject exams don’t test the same skills as coursework.

It’s not just the internet. For example, students are handing in essays straight from ChatGPT. Uni scanners flag it and the students may fail. But there is no good evidence either side, the uni side detection is unreliable (and unlikely to improve on false positives, or negatives for that matter) and it’s hard for the student to prove they did not use an LLM. Job seekers send in LLM generated letters. Consultants probably give LLM based reports to clients. We’re doomed.