Yeah, but the slop usually isn’t due to a greedy overhead who hasn’t even worked on the game demanding more money from fans

Why do studios seem to insist on sticking “SSD required” on their AAA games?

That’s not getting into the clusterfuck that’s the pricing and denuvo

Sm2 was really good, don’t get me wrong, but there is nowhere near enough coop/single player content yet for them to be thinking of a sequel already.

Release a fully baked game without a 2-year content road map before thinking about a sequel

Dysco Elyseum is one of my favourite games of all time, but fuck za-um

I love the campaign and the coop, but the pvp is weird. You feel big and heavy when moving around, but melt in half a second when fighting somebody. For a game with relatively low movement options, I’d prefer everybody to be a bit more beefy and have a higher time to kill

Fans already have a better fan-made version than anything these guys will give us

pushing nfts

In recent news, I am now radicalised

These kinds of charts are usually used to compare things that, in this case, wouldn’t be science, but humourously could be considered science if given a chance

But the other guy is right-if you don’t follow the scientific method and don’t try to describe your findings in ways that attempt to better understand the universe, then that’s not science. That’s bias

Based af dev

I feel like the only person in the world who dislikes oreos

After Ublock, its easily my favourite addon

This might be a hot take, but i prefer the compressed graphics of the original in most games over the 4k rerenders

Librewolf be like:

I agree that English is a constantly changing language, with many words meaning the same thing or single words meaning multiple different things. It’s the case with the male man, derived from werman, as is such with many other words

But your point ignores what I was trying to say

Anybody who feels the need to specify gender with such limited information is simply being sexist. Neither male nor female should be assumed in this instance

This goes for people other than those in the post; scholars and students should be held accountable alike

Whether these historic individuals were male or female is irrelevant. Only their creations truly matter

I’m confused by this quote - no sane person would assume a male did something just because we say man did it. In this instance, man would simply be referencing humanity

The want to define whether a male or female did it without any evidence is simply sexist

I’m not

Why are so many people talking about nuclear fission waste here?