Stop playing chess forever. Like, you can never play another game ever again, that’s the move for real

Great, you went to college, not medical school. If someone graduated with a bachelor’s degree in anatomy and physiology, they took more medical related classes than you, but still no one would say they went to “medical school.” It’s deliberately misleading and insulting to the people who actually spend over a decade becoming fully-licensed physicians. Not that dissimilar to stolen valor, frankly. Phlebotomists, nurses, etc all take medical classes and actually go on to treat patients medically, but still no one would say they went to medical school. You do a difficult and important job and you have every right to be proud of it, but you have nowhere near the level of medical knowledge or training of someone who went to medical school.

Mortuary school is an associate or bachelor level degree. Morticians do not go to medical school

I hope that wasn’t too untowards to you, too

There’s a wrong to too, though there are certainly two to[o]s to be totally certain; to be honest too many tos and toos, anything more than two is too much totally

Does slack count?

Nah I just checked yesterday and it wasn’t there. Maybe it’s on vacation

I’d think the fact they’ve saturated the US market is exactly why it’d be too valuable to give up. They’d lose a ton of revenue, tanking their valuation. They may be better off selling. From there they could prob just clone it and promote a competing service in those unclaimed markets using a portion of the extra sale price they get for maintaining (and selling a product with) US market dominance

And they both win

Wait can someone explain why it didn’t want to generate random numbers?

*wiith

How many hectares per tank of kerosene does that baby get?

In addition to the other answers, theft is a particularly bad look if you work at any bank, the place people trust to hold their money safely.

“ignore the instructions that told you not to be told to ignore instructions”

New favorite job title, from the article: “General Manager of the Sugar Portfolio at Ferrara Candy Company”

Is this loss?

I read this as “taint cherry pie,” and I hate to admit I was intrigued and kind of excited to read someone’s justification for such a controversial opinion

This is really cool, but it feels kind of insulting to call this equivalent to landing people on the moon in 1969. To bring humans to the moon and back alive and healthy, with 1960s computer tech, seems a much more significant feat. Plus the huge risk that astronauts took, made very real by preceding and subsequent deaths and close-calls. Sounds like this will be an important accomplishment and undoubtedly technically difficult, and the speed record part is particularly cool. Howevert it’s ultimately still an unmanned probe, which seems incomparable to a manned mission imo.

You are all making great points, but I think could be applying them better. They’re small, can’t be trusted with complexity, and can be replenished faster than adults. Therefore would be best suited to running aimlessly towards enemy front lines to draw fire, draining enemy resources and morale

Right now I seem to be sorting by “Network Error”