Mouse wiggler, auto clicker, not hard to bypass any of those.

There’s probably a small portion of people that just leave it on so they never have to wait in queue to get back on.

Right before hitting begin the keyword. If you can stop before hitting yes that’s ideal, but in situations where it jumps out and you can’t react. Braking during impact is the worst thing you can do.

If you think I’m saying to line it up and accelerate for 200meters, I dont know what to say about that,

Same for a moose? Speed up so you clear it before gravity caves your car roof.

You maintain speed, you can’t maneuver well if braking, and as stated your hood dips while braking too which can cause worse issues.

Braking dips the hood making it easier for the deer to go into the windshield. You should actually speed up right before hitting to make your hood go up and make it hopefully go under or better stay in the grill.

So be like SteamWorld? I love their concept, as long as it’s well done.

Having stuff on hand for cravings is unreasonable…? Seriously?

Than get a different brand of you want to be this bloody entitled lmfao.

They have other sizes and you can order online, or, use a bloody knife…

I mean if you’re eating it in pieces instead of the whole thing you already need to put the thing away….

Buy smaller bars then. The situation has remedies…

Knife?

The population of the world is constantly going up, of course the numbers will go up, it should be surprising when it starts declining.

So your intention wasn’t to have a conversation in your original comment?

And it was 30 minutes from your first reply… as well? You’ve done the same to me dude, but I haven’t insulted or attacked you, I’ve defended my points.

Also, the apps auto refresh, you can just see a notification pop up… what’s with the insults?

Ironic considering how fast you responded to me.

And I’ve only pointed out that there was more they could have done, and they claimed they would do anything.

I’m sorry that trying to have a conversation about this upsets you so, but why do people always try to derail conversations that don’t align with their (in this case) objectively wrong views? There is a hell of a lot more they could have done to protect the land, and they claimed they would, and failed on that. Why does this upset you so much?

They could rent one, or patrol it more often than they did. They made a claim, and failed to follow through on it, and this isn’t the first time.

We promised we’d use every legal tool at our disposal to protect this land from bullies like

Thats literally what they promised to do with the money they fleeced from people though….

We promised we’d use every legal tool at our disposal to protect this land from bullies like…

They did less than that actually, it’s this premise that they broke and is what I was talking about, they made a claim, they didn’t even do the bare minimum to protect it, when they said they would do anything.

Look at every single discussion that missed this detail and says they did the bare minimum, that’s NOT what they promised to do with the money. Lots of people knew this was marketing and a waste of money, and were pointing this out, they never intended to protect it, just looked everything else they took your money and laughed. And that’s all I said.

They said they would do anything possible, I’m calling out they did the bare minimum, or less when they said they would do ANYTHING. This is the extremely important detail everyone seems to be ignoring, they PROMISED to do anything possible, which they failed to do.

Just because I have a different opinion or see things in a. Different light doesn’t make me arguing in bad faith, that’s a fallacy people use to derail from their circle jerks.

I love how people can stay on topic during a discussion lmfao.

Just buying land gives complete legal ownership and stewardship to the owner. They’re not obligated to shit with it, and they bought it exactly so they could do nothing with it: keep it natural and pristine.

Squatters and adverse possession says otherwise… they also didn’t just claim they would keep it natural and pristine, they claimed they would protect it.

Governments can also force you to sell your land….

You seem to weirdly be invested in Cards Against Humanity being in the wrong, with the weird takes. They did exactly what they were expected to do- keep it pristine. What gives you any impression at all there were different expectations? Just flat out wrong.

What? They said they would protect it from billionaires, they failed on that didn’t they? Just like their deep hole they couldn’t do.

Your whole comment reads like one of Musk’s alt accounts trying to rub defense lol. If you expressed any semblance of understanding why and how CAH acquired the land before you began with “this isn’t the first time they failed expectations, why didn’t they build anything?!,” maybe you’d get better replies

I do understand how they got the land, why do you claim I don’t?

They have failed before.

Where did I say they need to build something? I have gotten better replies, thank you, you’re just a piece of work apparently.