But… but it was the house that passed it… the house is currently run by republicans…

I don’t know much about investing, but i wonder if it would it be a good time to short those companies?

I remember a documentary about a famous northwest passage expedition that was never seen again. One of the inuit people they talked to during an investigation claimed they found a boat, and in the captain’s quarters they found a body in the bed with a big smile on its face. That would be absolutely terrifying, but apparently that’s what naturally happens to corpses when their lips and gums receed.

I wonder how much more energy it took to accomplish that compared to just shooting a rocket. Last I had heard railguns weren’t really feasible because of the absurd amount of energy they would require even with perfect efficiency.

For me, every time it suggests the correct base word, it gets the ending wrong, so I have to type out the whole word anyway. For example, if I want past tense it’ll suggest the present tense of the word.

Oh I’m definitely an addict. Sometimes the first sip is way too good to just be about the taste. Its a bit annoying during the summer, coffee makes me sweat too much, but if I haven’t had a cup by 1pm or so, then I get a bad headache.

Maybe I remember wrong, but wasn’t he coordinating releases of leaked dnc data with Roger Stone? I’m gonna assume anyone dealing with Roger Stone is not on the up and up…

They found classified documents at this location. Why the hell would they leave without opening every door? This seems very basic to me…

• goes to auschwitz
• talks about himself

He clearly learned nothing.

I doubt he would have said anything unless it matched the party line, so its not completely uninformative. The problem I see is that I’m pretty sure that this peace solution has been proposed in the past, and it was the Palestinians who rejected it.

That’s a much taller order than you make it sound. It’d probably be easier to figure out fusion.

Fusion is the first step to a post scarcity world. All the new technology, products, agriculture methods, ect. that would be made possible with abundant, clean energy would completely transform the world. I doubt solar and wind could ever provide enough to make those advances.

Your being pedantic and defensive because you know and don’t like the answer. I can’t force you see reason so keep on living in your delusion. May it bring you peace and whatnot.

If someone puts a clearly empty jar in front of you, and I say there is something in it while you say there is nothing. Who is responsible for proving their point?

This isn’t a belief the same way religion is. It’s an observation of reality without assumptions. Every religion is man-made. They are obviously fictional in too numerous of ways to list, and none of them would be good enough for you because they would not be proof. Once again YOU CANNOT PROVE A NEGATIVE.

There may be recorded history of people making claims of religious events but none with any actual evidence. You don’t need to invalidate claims that were never validated in the first place.

Maybe this… maybe that. You can claim maybe for literally an infinite number of things, but unless there’s evidence or logic to follow, then it’s meaningless.

If you want to believe then go ahead, but don’t expect others to take you seriously. That’s my biggest problem with religion. Expecting others to believe the same things you do is incredibly arrogant.

They are not making the claim. The are denying the claim that there is some sentient creator. Those making the claim that there is are the ones who are responsible for proof.

Proving a negative is basically the definition of illogical. If it’s impossible, then requiring it is illogical.

They are not demanding the negative be accepted out of some unproveable belief. They are demanding that people use logical reasoning when forming conclusions.

The one making the claim is the one who has the burden of proof. Requiring someone to prove a negative is completely illogical.

I would also say that someone’s disbelief in someone else’s claim is not a belief system in itself.

No one is trying to arrest him because he is selective about what he releases. They want to arrest him because he aided in illegally accessing classified info. That is the behavior of a spy, not a jornalist. The person he aided was already found guilty and did their time.

Are you well known as a corrupt state?