No AI are to this level, are a massive security risk, and none are “smart”.
pay if it’s worth it
It isn’t.
I exist or something probably
No AI are to this level, are a massive security risk, and none are “smart”.
pay if it’s worth it
It isn’t.
They are too busy reading every email to profile you for ads and authoritarian purposes to do that.
Honestly I was expecting far more downvotes. I posted the video with people like you in mind, who still
can think criticallyare marks without the burden ofmisinformation and ideology.not being marks.
Ftfy
By the way, if you think you are not subject to ideology, I have several things to sell you.
For anyone else reading: everyone is subject to ideology. The moment you think you arent, that is when you are most trapped by it.
Removed by mod
And by “take over” you mean uselessly posture and dick waggle and colonialize in brand new space accords breaking ways.
This is not something anyone is winning.
It is not the first commercially funded fusion reactor even assuming this qualified.
https://www.energystartups.org/top/fusion-energy/
Not hard to find a bunch.
In what sense? They still have not achieved net power out.
Also “q>10 new reactor by 2027”
…🤣
Body weight exercises can build plenty of muscle. You only need specialized muscle targeting once you’re body building. For health body weight exercises are ideal, targeting individual muscles is not as useful to fitness as training many muscles in tandem for common movements.
They just smell nice, your skin is dead and you’re not retrieving anything from it. Just eat the fruits and veggies.
All you really need is the Nyquist frequency of human hearing to know. That’s a good breakdown for audiophiles I’m sure but it is broadly as simple as the Nyquist frequency.
I mean I disagree about not sympathizing with folks somewhat trapped in a hostile software ecosystem, but surely “stand by your beliefs” is not unheard of.
“Government hates what it can’t control”
tiktok
Lol. Look it sure was authoritarian the specific method used to ban tik tok. But you’re complaining about an authoritarian slap fight.
At this point I can only determine you are arguing for the sake of arguing.
Much of what you said is very wrong but it’s not worth arguing about.
Or you know, reducing thermal load by using broadly more efficient capacitors allowing you to shove more current in the car. Or by meeting grid scale requirements for car charging by smoothing out the grid impact of a bunch of charging at once. Or any number of benefits.
Ultimately this certainly benefits car charging. It benefits all electronics. No you won’t be getting two second car charges with this.
Almost every electrical system on the planet uses capacitors. Especially high power systems. Of which evs are.
“No real point in mixing capacitors in with a large battery” ?? That’s done literally all the time for both filtering and for intermittent high power output. Like when I say almost every electrical system uses caps, I mean almost every electrical system.
More of an actual comment, good. More efficient capacitors in both speed and heat certainly helps in charging devices of all sizes. Of course it wouldn’t be charging large batteries in seconds, but that doesn’t mean no improvement.
Why do you feel that the researchers are wrong about their physics research?
The moon is not tidally locked with the sun. Also the viable landing sites on the moon are tiny. There’s so much that’s difficult about the moon for settlement and solar power viability is actually one of them.
Why would librewolf specifically advise that you minimize your extensions to decrease client uniqueness if it had no effect on client uniqueness? Someone’s misinformed, and I don’t think its librewolf.
Because why solve trivial coding problem when experimental bad technology that won’t even work after a many fold increase in implementation time do trick?
As we all know, ai are the best and only solution to complex tasks such as rudimentary file management.