Hot
Hot
The CIA isn’t acting in the interest of the united states either, but still here we are
I mean, “at war” is the one time a small economy should be able to afford expensive equipment, since military spending becomes a priority. Look at isreal for an example of an economic midget nonetheless building the Merkava
it pokes through like a space marines pony tail
Missing shark => gay ikea fish
Gun breadboard.
beacuse we spent the last 20 years helping America perform aforementioned counter-insurgency in the middle east, to the obvious detriment of peer-to-peer conflict.
Nah
Well, at least they aren’t getting more expensive yet, it’d be werid explaining to my grandkids how I grew up in the ‘age of cheap semi-conductors’.
hide the cum stains
put some weighted (i.e. neutrally buoyant) ballpit balls in the water to disperse the shockwave.
Worth noting nuclear submarines have a sort of minimum-practical-size determined by the need for a functional nuclear reactor on board. Combined with the plain expense of nuclear reactors means that states can build way more ssk’s than ssn’s for a given budget. It’s often better to have three 25% chances of sinking the other guy than one 50% chance.
Do you want europe to make artillery shells like the old days?
All roads historical grievences lead to rome Akkad
Erhm ACHSHUALLEE the energy beams came out of the Whisk, not the plunger.
Pop scientists routinely mis-represent facts to make warfare seem unappealing and lame, this is due their ‘sense of morality’ (read: crying baby noises).
For example, Carl Sagan warned that operation desert storm would cause a (non)nuclear winter and mass famine in Asia.
“Why would anyone use a gun when you can just use a hand-held explosive?”
Ah yes, we would do that, definately haven’t already started… no, of course not.
ok but here me out: symbiotes are famously in short supply on trill, they gotta repopulate somehow.