So the original argument was pointless.

Got it.

Removed by mod

Yeah, and democracy isn’t perfect.

We’ve seen that from the very beginning of the US.

Ahh yes, the classic “there’s no reason to support good policies because other people do not.”

What a bunch of losers.

Rich people would be getting richer slower and the world would be a better place.

So what’s the point of the rhetorical argument: “the state says it’s not okay to do this, and then they go and do it”?

Woah, now we’re moving goalposts.

I thought the argument was, “the state says it’s not okay to do this, and then they go and do it.”

to include those who show any criticism whatsoever of the current Bibi administration.

I’m not sure why you’re specifically mentioning one man’s administration.

The main conflation of anti-Semitism has been with anti-Zionism, which dates back far before Bibi came into power.

when a mob of protesters attacked a Jewish student, and the next day, when a mob trapped a group of Jewish students in a study room

The important part here seems to be left out: did Harvard punish the students responsible for this? I find it hard to believe that they got away with this if they actually did it and we know who they are.

Agreed. They should do it as cheaply and quickly as possible to set an example of how executions don’t need to be expensive.

That said, the common methods for execution used today are surprisingly expensive.

It doesn’t have to be.

The government says it’s okay to murder this person, so let’s murder him.

By that “logic”, states also shouldn’t be allowed to imprison people.

People who feel like they have nothing to live for often take their frustration out on others.

It’s like they know their lives suck and likely won’t get better, so they focus on making other people’s lives worse because it’s literally all they feel they can do.

Except for pedophiles!

Removed by mod

Zionists don’t argue in good faith.

It pushes them away from that.

All it did was cause them to run the exact same candidate that lost to Trump but this time with a penis.

Not sure why this is being downvoted.

Alaskan Airlines had another issue in 2000 where they purposefully ignored engineers’ warnings on maintenance leading to a plane crash that killed everyone on board.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alaska_Airlines_Flight_261

Businesses view safety as a cost-benefit analysis. If it’s cheaper to kill people than it is to make products safe, then that’s what they’re going to do.

I’m sure she’s concerned about people until it fucks with her money.

Like most establishment democrats and their supporters.

Eh, the problem is that people think they’re making progress with establishment democrats in office.

The lesser-evil is still evil. A slow loss is still a loss.