That’s fine. I’m sure the passive masses will show back up.
The real problem is content creators and such are or have already left. And well, I’m here, as are all of you!
Passive consumers are a massive force, and will go where the wind blows. But they actively do little. And, about them… Who cares?
One group is full of hundred-millionaires. The other group is full of destitute people fleeing their home countries due to horrific conditions.
Given that capitalism does put a price on people, that’s obviously the metric used to determine who to help.
Unfortunately, the only “hammering” most of the democrats are doing is fearmongering-to-donate to their campaign.
The progressive democrats are a whole different story. They’re the ones supporting subversive traveling doctors to facilitate bodily autonomy rights.
s/woke/treating people with respect and dignity/g
People who have a problem with “woke”, well… yeah. Not worth your time.
But the real issue with Stallman wasn’t the ideological extremism of computing, which he has been proved 100% right. The problem was the unwelcome sexual advances, commentary, and physical actions towards women around him. Or, you know, his casting couch in the faculty room. Or the “and hot ladies” sign.
His unrestrained sexism (treating women like objects, and not fellow humans) is why I quit donating to the FSF. And it detracts from the real message that FLOSS software is HUMANE software.
Sometimes, those views just sort of have a way of imploding.