I am not disagreeing with that point; I actually wholeheartedly agree that it is not a good solution. I wanted to remind poster that those people are victims of the system, are trapped in it. We need to have compassion for them.

Trump is going to give a metal to this asshole

I hope it’s cylindrical and moving very fast hehe

People are trying to escape what others are doing to them.

IBM supported the Nazis, and if they’re the only tech giant not fighting musk they’re going to get the kickbacks. Corps dont do “writing on the wall” anymore, they chase money, which may look similar but the goals are different.

Pitcher is easier to spill when I’m being hunted.

Also lifestraw is reusable, unlike many other systems.

Way to have a bad therapist and project it on others instead of realizing it was a bad therapist.

“It’s crazy, all we had to do was inverse the YT algorithm,” said anonymous Google employee.

“I have more respect for loyal DOGS than I do for PEOPLE who don’t take care of their children," in the vacuum they’re describing, could be interpreted as having a lot of respect for dogs and little respect for abusive parents, which are not asshole takes.

Survivorship bias!

Many corporations force you to sign away your work when working for them, so what you describe is already happening.

If you’re a company why would you even fuck with more difficult trade.

Labelling someone as a critic when they make an observation is very othering.

This seems to be attempting to tear down an org that is trying to do the right thing?

You’d provably enjoy a movie called “Slaves on holiday” where it’s just about slaves being allowed to look at the sun for a day.

Average salary there is misrepresented, look at median income. That uses the total income of a household, and you can see there that it’s ~70k a year in 2021 per that article. Updated numbers are 76k, for a whole household.

That’s for a household with dual incomes.

Median income is 76k per household, so no, a 2 job family making median cannot live the dream.

One of them only introduces facts. The other adds flavor. Whether or not you consider the titles relatively neutral, one does introduce bias relative to the other one.

Introducing Walz as a VP hopeful sounds like they’re describing a Palin-level government official, not someone who has been active in politics for years.

Less time moving from line to line, and due to the alternating you would have a much harder time accidentally skipping lines.

okay bub