![](https://social.rights.ninja/system/accounts/avatars/000/000/001/original/328c88fa980617b2.png)
![](https://lemmy.ml/pictrs/image/2QNz7bkA1V.png)
I definitely agree that these types of blocking are ineffective and generally do more harm than good, but if governments are going to push for this stuff, it would be good to have a solution that doesn’t harm people’s security and privacy.
Boring enough to use #Debian, fun enough to use #Arch • #Hardware & #Software Development • #RapidPrototyping • #EmbeddedSystems — he/him
I don’t post exclusively about one topic. Expect random stuff on #coding, #retrocomputers, #DIYsolar, or things I’m passionate about like #livablecities, #a11y.
I love to chat about my own interests, but also boost/share things that are new to me that I find interesting. #art, #literature, #food, and whatever else, I’m excited to explore it all!
I definitely agree that these types of blocking are ineffective and generally do more harm than good, but if governments are going to push for this stuff, it would be good to have a solution that doesn’t harm people’s security and privacy.
My scheme doesn’t require any identity information to be provided by the user.
The ISP already has PII, but that’s a risk that already exists today.
It might hurt their bottom line, but the big companies operate in so many different markets and I don’t think there’s any risk of _all_ of them enacting these types of restrictions.
I’m on mastodon, so I can’t downvote (only “like”, which translates to an upvote).
It’s the US republicans who want to do this, not me, I’m just approaching this as an interesting problem.
As for my suggested solution, the only database would be the list of sites with adult content. No new personal data would be stored about individuals.
I’m not suggesting that ISPs implement photo-ID checks, just a login with your ISP username/password (an account you already have).
I don’t think there’s any risk of _any_ of these schemes killing off internet porn.
The current government schemes all rely on porn companies opting in and on the government/ISPs to catalog all porn sites on the internet.
Yeah, it’s quite the rabbit hole.
I think there’s still a place for certain types of pre-orders.
There are many projects where the production of the product requires an upfront cost and a pre-order is needed to cover these.
I have pro-ordered many a small batch electronics device and have had no issues. However, in these cases the design of the device is already complete and the features/specs all known in advance.
The same goes for all the books I’ve pre-ordered from indie publishers, for the same reason, the book is already finished but production is too expensive for a small publisher to cover without pre-sales.
The issues come when pre-ordering something that _isn’t_ complete, especially if it’s working on an as-of-yet unsolved problem. Frankly, I wish that platforms like kickstarter would have a dedicated section for “production cost” pre-orders that had a different sales agreement and some vetting to ensure that products got delivered and were as advertised.
It’s definitely a shame that reddit is making these changes. The fall of reddit is going to have pretty negative affect for a lot of people.
I’m no fan of corpo platforms—I’d love more widespread adoption of open protocols and software—but I don’t want _users_ to get hurt by the loss.
@TheCuriousCoder87
You wouldn’t necessarily have to actually give a CA any details about yourself, just integrate this into the existing ISP portals.
An adult can log into the provider’s website and click to generate any client certs they need.
I think this method is maybe a bit _too_ technical (compared to a simple captive portal like you get on public wifi) but I think it would work okay as long as end-users didn’t have to go to a 3rd-party or provide any additional information to their ISP to use it.