• 4 Posts
  • 721 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 13th, 2023

help-circle



  • Where did I say that? All I’m saying is that while the problem that women are underrepresented in politics is a real problem and we should elect more women, since women’s issues also are usually underrepresented, we shouldn’t elect or even cover people because of what’s between their legs.

    The Thatcher thing is that for example if the choice is between US Jewish Space Lasers Lady (just so that it’s not the same person again) and her opponent, “voting for the woman” might get you an opposite effect that you expect on for example women’s rights or the over all sanity of politics.

    There are a ton of great women in politics, like Sanna Marin, elect more of them. But elect them because of their work, not their genitalia.




  • I browse Reddit only for one sub, a country-specific one that is reasonably niche. Right when the API migration happened, there seemed to be a very visible migration of Facebook/Instagram people migrating over to Reddit. Posts asking where to find Instagram/Facebook functionality came in daily, and the overall quality of both comments and posts degraded a lot, suddenly posts had a ton of comments with one word and a ton of emojis.


  • only seven of the top 20 most prominent figures in election coverage have been women

    That stat only makes sense if compared with the ratio of women vs men in politics. It’s either legitimate, or it’s like someone saying “100% of the coverage in the US presidential election goes to male candidates”. I’m not saying it’s as it should be, it’s just maybe the problem is one level deeper, that there aren’t enough women in politics, not that they don’t get covered.

    That said, just based on experience with other nations’ politics (I don’t know enough about the UK), it looks like progressives elect whoever based on policy, and it may be a man or a woman, but conservatives in general like their strong men, so in aggregate there are just more men.

    My point is, maybe it just goes back to “let’s fix politics”. And all that said, more coverage may get more women elected, but on the other hand, maybe it all should be more about policy, lest we get more Thatchers.




  • But those Tigers don’t carry people within them, so it’s not fastroping, they are flying with a bunch of dudes attached to the thing, FRIES style. Though I wonder if a Tiger can even lift that, that would explain why you need to go down.

    So, no, not fastroping, it’s screaming and plummeting to your death attached to an Eurocopter. There are worse ways to go I suppose.










  • So if I understand correctly, the reason it’s outdated is not because we don’t need those pesky banking regulations any more, but that it has been found that banks will just take out their own loans to cover the reserves they need from the central bank, so they can just lend as much as they want, no seatbelts. And the central bank will never run out of loans to give, since they have insane reserves, in their own currency it is technically unlimited.

    So money is not really the thing we think it is. If banks overextend themselves and fuck up, the only thing we’ll see instead of failing banks is runaway inflation in the consumer and asset (housing) markets. Wonder where I’ve seen that.