![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.ml/pictrs/image/gWmVEUZ94Z.png)
Almost a troll-like insistence on lack of nuance to an extremely complex situation
Almost a troll-like insistence on lack of nuance to an extremely complex situation
Removed by mod
That’s quite the false equivalence you’ve made there
Thank you. As someone who knows nothing about that religion this headline was extremely confusing to me
Right? Name one thing, anywhere in humanity, that somebody isn’t profiting from
Even accounting for how car-centric US cities are, I agree with that commenter. Yeah it may be hard to get downtown from outlying neighborhoods without a car, but sidewalks have ramps and building have access. Hell, the parking lots have designated parking spaces. Not true at all in most European cities
Edit: I guess it’s worth a little more nuance than just limping all European cities in the same category. The wealthier northern cities have definitely caught up a bit (though they all still have buildings that are completely inaccessible). The real problems are the southern cities like Rome, Madrid, Athens, Lisbon etc.
Tl;dr - some businesses will be impacted, but it probably won’t drag down our economy much at all.
Does it really need to push the idea that a new conflict is coming though? The US military moves people around with unclear (public) reasons often.
They also make windows tickers that say “in case of emergency we have xyz pets”. Good to stick one next to the front door.
Statistical modeling.
And yes, I am miffed about the use of the word “exponential” in this post’s title.
It’s a stretch to say that because they invest in a company, that they “produce” the greenhouse gases that that company emits.
Yeah, they could invest elsewhere but it’s just disingenuous to say they’re responsible for all those carbon emissions.
Removed by mod