Problem is, no one admits that and lies about it. So here we are. A lawyer can only help so much when you lie about it.

Amazon was using people to train the model, so at the starts it would be 100%, but eventually the goal would be to get near zero, maybe the average was 70% but when the ended it was near 40%?

Difference is, the mouse can’t die, a person can. But the mouse can be continued by anyone…

And they were in this specific case……… they aren’t trying to railroad her, they gave her the 2 standard options for remedying it, that has been used for decades already throughout the industry to deal with these exact issues, since shit fucking happens. If a business starts making a habit of it, of course they will deal with it, you seriously think they would just let a business continually do it? Get a fucking grip on reality FFS.

She refused the two standard options, and is now suing for above and beyond damages, that’s why she’s being countersued. The business was trying to be accountable FFS lmfao. Both sides can be assholes AND wrong here, or did that thought never cross your mind….?

Of course they can’t just up and fucking do it lmfao, the second time a company tried that they would lose their business license and everything else. The courts aren’t stupid like you are.

Shit happens, most people understand this, I’m sorry you expect everyone to be perfect.

If they can give her one the same size as hers, fully wooded, that might matter.

That is quite literally exactly what the deal is…….

Literally the lot right next to it, so she can’t even complain it’s a different location…

Which is why she was offered the identical lot next door that still has all of that?

Shit happens, she was given recourse and demanded far more than the damages she incurred.

How does swapping two properties benefit one? They need to pay for all the legal paperwork and everything, they aren’t coming out ahead, since the cost of the house would be the same on either property.

You seem to think the developer benefits here? Even though it’ll costs thousands of dollars in legal fees to process everything? And in the end all they have is a lot with a house, that they would have still had regardless? Where is the benefit to the developer?

And yes, when it comes track homes every property is more or less the exact same, that’s the entire point of them. Theres actually very few cases where lots have any significant difference to them, except for custom communities that are a rarity anywhere.

The options are restore it (identical lot next door), or a fair market value, which would be the cost of the land plus repair, or a suitable replacement. She ignored two fair trades that have plenty of precedent in courts, to achieve more damages than she should be entitled too. She definitely seems like she’s trying to get her cake and eat it here too.

You aren’t entitled to the value of the house, that’s going above and beyond damages.

Is that not what they are doing by offering an identical lot next to it that cost the same?

Did any of those go anywhere? People love just throwing shit and seeing what sticks. Nothing I’ve seen have shown any actual evidence, nor these investigations leading to anything…

But sure perpetuate misinformation, you do you mate.

I see this repeated, but no sources provided.

Those are all binary outputs, neurolink allows analog.

Totally different goals, so no nothing else exists currently.

Got a link to share? Nothing else can do analog inputs like neurolink can, so would love to see this tech that isn’t even been talked about yet that you’re spouting all over this thread.

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

Than why doesn’t the tech exist yet…?

On/off isn’t the same as being able to control the input incrementally.

EEG and neurolink are two different techs accomplishing quite different goals in the end,

EEG can’t input analog inputs, neurololink is accomplishing an entirely different tech, so that’s quite literally impossible. Sorry.