Mods can’t issue permanent site-wide bans.
Mods can’t issue permanent site-wide bans.
deleted by creator
Or been unable to pay his bills and been forced to sell at 4k / coin.
I’d default on the bills and keep the bitcoin.
abiutbthe fi al
You okay?
deleted by creator
I considered recommending “attempt at” but “an attempt at a model” still sounds weird. OP went with “to create” which sounds better 🙂
Aw how come you always take his ideas instead of mine it’s not fair
It does. How about
An attempt to summarize a comprehensive threat model for emails
Or, in place of summarize - define, or outline?
An attempt to a comprehensive threat model for emails
That’s the subtitle, is it missing a word?
What do you use?
deleted by creator
Bill Gates was an evil piece of shit, that did many illegal things to secure Microsoft’s software empire.
Yup. And his wife left him because of his association with Epstein.
Melinda Gates Says Bill Gates’s Work with “Abhorrent” Jeffrey Epstein Led to Divorce
When a site makes me do that I use one of my domains with a certain four letter word in it beginning with F.
I also have a very snarky hotmail account that every year or so I have to take over someones reddit account because they decided to use it.
That’s very funny.
Whenever I get prompted for an unverified email address, for example to use wifi in a hotel, I always put [email protected]. Actually, come to think of it, x.com is the new twitter. I have been doing that for many years and never made the connection until now.
Do you have an email address associated with your account? I created my reddit account before email addresses were required. A couple weeks ago I received a site wide ban for unspecified reasons. On the main web site it just said that I had a permanent ban. But on old.reddit.com, it says “provide an email address to reactivate your account”. So in my case the purpose of the ban was simply to force me to give them my email address, which I declined to do.
*Reichsleiter
deleted by creator
That’s interesting. I have read multiple comments to the effect that it would not be possible for lemmy to implement anonymous voting because the underlying ActivityPub protocol does not support it. So it sounds like solutions do exist, although I suppose the effort required to modify ActivityPub is too much, more likely the feature will be included in some successor to the fediverse.
That’s when you resolve a dispute in front of a judge
Normally degraded performance means that things happen too slowly, not too quickly.