Almost three years since the deadly Texas blackout of 2021, a panel of judges from the First Court of Appeals in Houston has ruled that big power companies cannot be held liable for failure to provide electricity during the crisis. The reason is Texas’ deregulated energy market.

The decision seems likely to protect the companies from lawsuits filed against them after the blackout. It leaves the families of those who died unsure where next to seek justice.

In February of 2021, a massive cold front descended on Texas, bringing days of ice and snow. The weather increased energy demand and reduced supply by freezing up power generators and the state’s natural gas supply chain. This led to a blackout that left millions of Texans without energy for nearly a week.

The state has said almost 250 people died because of the winter storm and blackout, but some analysts call that a serious undercount.

  • Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    10 months ago

    Cops don’t have to serve and protect or abide by the law. Power companies don’t have to supply power. People who sell you things can deny you access to them.

    Hey this is fun, let’s do more!

  • TigrisMorte@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    It is almost like natural monopolies, such as primary power generation and supply, should be under the control of the Government and not private individuals.

    • jasondj@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      That’s communism and we are a capitalist country.

      The right thing to do under a capitalist economy is to buy the government and give yourself a monopoly.

      This isn’t a natural monopoly, it’s protected by legislature and cronyism.

      A proper capitalist approach to utilities, then the pipes and wires need to be considered no different then the road they are installed on. Recoup money by selling metered wholesale access to the carriers and utilities.

      But we don’t have proper capitalism. We have this bastardized American version that sucks.

      We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

      We settled it before the damn constitution even started. How these nitwits in DC don’t see how publicly run infrastructure doesn’t provide for the common defense or promote general welfare is beyond me. But I guess running water, heat, affordable healthcare, and an ability to communicate with each other and the rest of the world doesn’t count under that, somehow.

      Maybe if the courts took the founders intent from the Prologue instead of the secret letters to their mistresses, we’d have a functional system. But that’s just my opinion.

      • otp@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        A government providing services is not communism, it’s a first-world standard.

  • BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Let me guess, if I don’t like it I’m free to start my own power generation company, in a city that’s had only one provider for over 60 years.

  • Coasting0942@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    10 months ago

    Phew. Worried this could lead to overturning that cops have no duty to protect you.

    If you don’t like the service you’re getting then just vote in new leaders who can change things /s

  • girlfreddy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Three cheers for privatization of public utilities! /s

    As an aside, I am gutted by 250+ people losing their lives because Texan politicians can’t get their act together to hold companies responsible. Legislation works … and politicians can, and should, make the laws.

    • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      They do have their act together. It just doesn’t include doing anything good for Texans.

  • fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Hot take: The ruling is accurate.

    Vote for candidates who privatize utilities. Get what you vote for.

    Only sucks for those that can’t leave and are stuck with a system they can’t correct.

  • LostWon@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Yikes. You’d think in a place where they know they will have extraordinary weather events, they would legislate special requirements to ensure everyone’s safety.

    Incidentally, I first heard about this saga when I saw a report a while ago about people being scammed by solar panel grifters (who overcharge for installing systems that provide little to no independence from the grid despite making those claims in their ads).

    • DoomBot5@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      It’s a good opportunity to remind people: solar panels without a grid disconnect and/or a battery are not independent of the grid. The utility company will shut them off while the power is out.

  • twelve20two @slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    In the opinion, Justice Adams noted that, when designing the Texas energy market, state lawmakers “could have codified the retail customers’ asserted duty of continuous electricity on the part of wholesale power generators into law.”

    Wow, so helpful to say that 20 years after the fact

    • wizzor@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      10 months ago

      I agree with the problem, but I also kind of agree with the judge. The point of separation of powers is that the judicial system interprets the will of the legislative. We have had similar cases in Finland , where the law clearly should say one thing and the courts conclude that the law in fact says another thing. Fortunately, this situation occasionally leads the parliament into saying ‘well fuck’ and changing the law.

      I will admit I don’t really understand the role of courts making law in the US and other common law countries, so it might be different there.

      • frezik@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        The one time I remember something like that happening in the US was the 2003 Do Not Call telemarketing act. There was a court case that concluded that Congress had not properly authorized regulators to enforce the Do Not Call registry. Congress then took a day or two to pass a new law authorizing the thing they forgot to the first time.

        This comes down to two things:

        • Americans really, really hate taking telemarketing calls, regardless of party affiliation
        • The telemarketing industry didn’t have significant lobbying at the time to tell anyone in Congress to argue against it
  • kreynen@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    The free market solution would allow communities to negotiate contracts that DID hold the provider liable and allow competitors to emerge that would focus on different aspects like reliability, renewable production or integration with other grids.

    If you aren’t aware of the story of Central and Southwest Corporation (a Texas power company) and thr “midnight connection”, it’s the type of story that I’m sure is nearing the top of Netflix’s documentary todo list.

    On May 4, 1976, a power company based in Texas sent electricity from a substation in Vernon, Texas, to Altus, Okla. By doing so, they were breaking a deal among power companies in Texas to keep electricity within state borders.

    https://www.kut.org/energy-environment/2022-09-08/texas-energy-island-the-disconnect-vernon-midnight-connection

    If what Texas has with ERCOT is neither free market nor a public utility, what is it?