It’s Mickey, but not as you’ve ever seen him before.

A trailer for a slasher film, featuring a masked killer dressed as Mickey Mouse, was released on 1 January, the day that Disney’s copyright on the earliest versions of the cartoon character expired in the US.

“We wanted the polar opposite of what exists,” the movie’s producer said.

A new Mickey-inspired horror game, showing the rodent covered with blood stains, also dropped on the same day.

Steamboat Willie, a 1928 short film featuring early non-speaking versions of Mickey and Minnie, entered the public domain in the US on New Year’s Day.

It means cartoonists, novelists and filmmakers can now rework and use the earliest versions of Mickey and Minnie.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    I suppose, but it feels more like a cheap cash grab to me.

    If the game or the movie are anything more than mediocre, I’ll reconsider.

    • AbidanYre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Oh, it’s undoubtedly that too. But if these characters had entered public domain decades ago like they should have, something similar would have been done and the novelty of beloved characters doing “shocking” things would have worn off.

      Maybe backlash is the wrong word, but their own damn fault at least.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s definitely Disney’s fault. The original reason they convinced Sonny Bono to extend the copyright act was because it was the home video era and it meant anyone could start selling VHS tapes with Steamboat Willie on them. Now that era is over, so Disney cares a lot less.

        • glimse@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Look at their acquisitions since the last time they lobbied for an extension…They own Star Wars, Marvel, and Hulu now. They don’t care (about extending the copyright) this time because Steamboat Willie ain’t shit to them (in terms of income) anymore. Mickey Mouse might as well just be the logo for Disneyland/world at this point

          Edit: added stuff in parenthesis to clarify what I’m saying

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            But the landscape has also changed. If people were still buying physical media in large numbers or significantly buying digital media rather than relying on streaming services, Disney would have more money in the game to lose. But no one stands to make money from just trying to sell Steamboat Willie as-is.

            Also, Disney is vicious about defending their trademarks. I think they care about Mickey a hell of a lot more than you think and they will be watching very closely for anything that steps out of line into trademark violation territory regarding Steamboat Willie.

            • glimse@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              To clarify, I meant that don’t care about fighting to extend the copyright. I see how my wording implies they don’t care about Steamboat Willie so I’ll edit my comment

              they will be watching very closely for anything that steps out of line into trademark violation territory regarding Steamboat Willie.

              Definitely agree with you here

              • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                Ok, I get you now. I think both your and my factors probably play a part. I’m just glad there’s no major corporation out there left trying to extend copyright law even longer than the ridiculous 70 years after the author’s death that it is now.

                For much of the 20th century, copyright in the U.S. was 19 years with an option to extend for another 19 when that expired. And it should have stayed that way.

    • Poppa_Mo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is the exact template for Blood and Honey, really. Put all $10 of your budget into the Public Domain sweetie, pay everyone else with exposure.

      Laugh at the shitty but honest reviews all the way to the bank.