• GlitterInfection@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    They’re a massive and combinatorially exploding part of the equation, though.

    Imagine a world where instead of using AI to undermine writers and artists, we use it to explode their output. A writer could write the details that make a character unique, and the key and side quest dialogs that they write now, which could be used to customize a model for that character.

    The player can now have realistic conversations with those characters that would make everything better. You could ask for directions to something and then follow it up with more questions that the NPC should know the answer to. Etc.

    Now inconsequential filler characters, like a ramen shop owner in the example, become something potentially memorable but explicitly useful in a way that could never possibly be hand crafted.

    This article is shitting on an incredible early attempt to allow for this by taking the fact that it’s not done yet and crossing that with their biased opining and producing a kotaku-style click bait from it.

    • 50gp@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      you do know that quality over quantity right? nobody likes bethesdas radiant fetch quests and this is that but with exposition dumping npcs

      • bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        Not even just exposition. An NPC could easily go off script and start talking about stuff that breaks immersion. Like imagine you’re sitting in a tavern in Skyrim and then some NPC comes up and is like “hey, you see any good movies lately?”