A New York-bound Virgin Atlantic flight was canceled just moments before takeoff last week when an alarmed passenger said he spotted several screws missing from the plane’s wing.

  • Custoslibera@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    5 months ago

    I would have been fine flying on that plane.

    Highly unlikely that panel was critical to keeping the plane in the air even if it did come off during flight.

    • rusticus@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      5 months ago

      You don’t think it’s possible that missing bolts in a non critical part of the plane is reflective of poor inspection and maintenance and that would increase the risk of missing or loose bolts in, say, a door?

      • Custoslibera@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        Yep, any number of reasons why it could have been left like that.

        I’ve been on planes where I’ve seen duct tape on the wings, it’s really not an issue other than psychological.

          • Custoslibera@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            5 months ago

            As in, do I think it means there are poor inspection practices?

            No it isn’t indicative of this. Planes fly with things wrong with them every single day.

            There is every chance that the maintenance crew notified people of this - it was signed off as still being airworthy and the whole reason this was an issue is actually because PR not a risk to safety.

            • rusticus@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              Okay whatever you have to tell yourself bra. If this were not a concern they would have FLOWN THE PLANE and not grounded it out of safety concern. lol.

      • ItsMeSpez@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        In the end I recognize that I am not the expert on these matters in any way. I have no idea what a properly maintained aircraft looks like and pretty much have to trust the people who are paid to know these things. If you’re uncomfortable with something, by all means mention it, but it’s folly to assume you know better or can make even decent assumptions about the maintenance of a plane unless you are an aircraft mechanic.

        • rusticus@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          You didn’t really answer or address my question. If you walk into a restaurant and see a rat running by table #2, do you just assume that “the restaurant experts” know better than you and it is safe to eat the food?

          • lingh0e@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            5 months ago

            By all means, if you are concerned about something on the plane, please mention it to a member of the flight crew.

            That said, you’ve used a poor analogy.

            There’s a difference between understanding the significance of a rat in a restaurant and understanding the significance of some bolts missing from a piece of fuselage… which is the point of the comment you’re glibly replying to.

            Most people understand the concept of rats being harbingers of illness, but most people don’t understand the finer mechanics of powered flight. We put our trust in the flight crew to have that greater understanding, that they won’t put our OR their lives in danger by cutting corners. Chances are good that if the flight crew isn’t concerned, you don’t need to be either.

            • Evia@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              5 months ago

              No but we do know the basic function of screws: holding shit together. The absence of screws implies that shit is not held together fully. Is it still sufficient to fly? Maybe. But the presence of screw holes implies that somebody in the development process thought them necessary and now they’re not there.

              Sure, it’s likely safe in the same was that the restaurant rat is likely not carrying a plague. But it’s not guaranteed and I’m not willing to be the one to test it

            • rusticus@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              They why did they ground the plane if they weren’t concerned? And then replace the bolts that you claim aren’t necessary? Are they cosmetic bolts? lol.

              • lingh0e@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                5 months ago

                I didn’t say anything about that plane, and I didn’t say anything about bolts being unnecessary. I was simply responding to the other guys bad analogy because he kept demanding someone answer his question.

            • gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              but most people don’t understand the finer mechanics of powered flight.

              Pretty sure “are all the bolts in their holes” is more of an “I can put IKEA furniture together pretty well” level and not “finer details of the mechanics of flight” level

        • Evia@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          Sure, this is why the passenger raised the issue to make sure someone responsible was aware of it and could make that safety judgement. And clearly they were right to do so if the pilot (or whoever) grounded the plane.

    • Tessellecta@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      5 months ago

      Panels coming off during flight is still not ideal, even if they’re not critical to flying. They can hit things that are more essential.

        • lad@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Yeah, it’s like if a door would fall off a plane in the course of a flight, very unlikely

          • Custoslibera@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            Touché, although I’m assuming this is a different model of aircraft so not plagued by the same issues.

          • Custoslibera@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            The reason I think that it’s unlikely to be problematic is because the experts quoted in the article said it’s unlikely to be problematic.

            I also have a very small amount of knowledge on this and know that planes fly with missing parts/broken things all the time, just like how everything in our car isn’t working 100% of the time either but we still drive it.