“Kenny just began to gasp for air repeatedly and the execution took about 25 minutes total.”

Pretty compassionate way to kill a person.

Once again, the Law in the south is brutal.

  • DaddleDew@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    171
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    I personally experienced breathing nitrogen until loss of consciousness under controlled and supervised conditions for training purposes with the RCAF. I was in a room with seven other people who were all doing the same thing as well as instructors who were in here with us for safety.

    The point of the exercise was to sit in a room with a mask on, recognize the symptoms of hypoxia when we experienced them and throw a lever that would resume normal air breathing once we had enough. We were given tablets with simple games to play to simulate having our minds occupied on accomplishing some tasks. We knew they were going to switch or air supplies with pure nitrogen at some point to cause hypoxia but we didn’t know when it was going to happen. The room was also a hypobaric chamber but it didn’t stimulate a high enough altitude to induce hypoxia by itself, it was only there to simulate the environmental signs of decompression ( fogging of the air, percieved drop in pressure, cooling sensation, etc)

    We sat there for a few minutes accomplishing the tasks on the tablets (basically paying candy crush) with nothing special going on. Then I noticed that we all started breathing deeper and harder. When I looked around people were also red in the face but strangely did not feel any discomfort from it and some people were even still playing on their tablets without noticing. Some of them threw their personal lever immediately because the point of the exercise was to recognize the signs of hypoxia. But others including my competitive ass wanted to see how far I could take it and if I could outlast others so we kept going.

    My breathing naturally got deeper and harder but strangely I wasn’t feeling like I was suffocating. I started feeling pins and needles in my extremities. Concentrating on the tasks in the tablet became increasingly difficult and slower. A few moments later I got tunnel vision and my hearing started to sound muffled. These two effects progressively got worse until I could almost not see or hear anything anymore at which point I finally threw the lever just before passing out due to a phenomenon called oxygen paradox where when oxygen supply is resumed the hypoxia symptoms briefly get worse before going away. I didn’t even notice passing out. I woke up a few moments later and from my perspective it seemed that time had skipped forward a minute. Had I not thrown the lever and there were no instructors to do it for me I would have died a few moments later.

    All of this took less than 5 minutes and I never experienced anything worse than mild discomfort throughout. I don’t know how they managed to make it last 25 minutes other than maybe the brain stem running on fumes and keeping the heart beating but there is no consciousness at that point. If I ever had to pick a way to be executed this would be it, provided that it is done correctly.

    • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      99
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Sounds like they didn’t remove the CO2, just gave him a mask that forced him to breathe nitrogen. Like a standard medical respirator, so he spent half an hour rebreathing his CO2 and whatever oxygen slipped in around the mask.

      • ZMonster@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        10 months ago

        I know that CO2 is what the body uses to push the sensation of “needing” air. So I wonder if that would have changed his CO2 content from what it would be in just nitrogen…

    • snooggums@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      51
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      10 months ago

      You did that in a safe situation where nobody was trying to kill you. I don’t suffer when holding my breath underwater, but the moment someone holds me down I am going to panic.

      • El Barto@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        62
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Try to hold your breath for as much as you can, and you will feel an very strong urge to breathe. This doesn’t happen with nitrogen.

        Sure, the person is mad scared, but he’s not suffering because of the nitrogen.

        • snooggums@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          62
          ·
          10 months ago

          “Waterboarding doesn’t cause suffering because it isn’t literally drowning.”

          That’s what you sound like.

          • cynar@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            48
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            The body is weird when it comes to breathing. It doesn’t measure one of the critical gasses. 3 things particularly send the body into a breathing panic.

            • Rising CO2 (via blood acidity)

            • Water in the airways.

            • Resistance to inflating the lungs.

            Water boarding is particularly evil, since it creates just enough of the last 2 to trigger a full blown drowning reaction, but is light enough to not actually be dangerous. This lets the questioner hold the victim in that zone, without permanent physical harm (but massive psychological harm).

            Nitrogen hypoxia doesn’t set off any of those triggers. This makes it particularly dangerous to some workers. They don’t realise anything is wrong until they pass out.

            Also, to clarify. I am massively against the death penalty. It’s both cruel, and not particularly effective as a deterrent. It’s also no cheaper, in practice, than life imprisonment. However, if it is going to be used, it should be as humane as possible. Nitrogen hypoxia is about as humane as it can get.

            • snooggums@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              19
              ·
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              They cannot do it humanely with a method that requires the person to breath normally to work. If they can hold their breath it will always be inhumane because they will still be struggling and have the same impending doom and physical reaction as waterboarding.

              It does not matter if the chemical properties are different when the person has a working brain and doesn’t want to die. Or if it is being implemented by incompetent people who couldn’t even kill him with lethal injection in 2022.

              • cynar@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                8
                ·
                10 months ago

                So what method would you suggest, assuming you must choose a method?

                I’m completely against the death penalty. It’s no longer an option over here in the UK. However, if it must be done, do it as humanely as possible.

                • bitwaba@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  13
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  Locked in a box, with a cat, a flask of poison, a radioactive source, and a Geiger counter.

                  Except when the Geiger counter gets a hit, it sets off a nuclear bomb inside the box so I’m instantly vaporized.

                  • cynar@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    5
                    ·
                    10 months ago

                    It only truly works if you can isolate the room completely. That’s quite hard to do with a nuke involved. You’ll definitely know when they are dead!

                    Unfortunately, I believe any use of nuclear weapons is prohibited by treaties. Might I suggest a giant acme hammer or anvil? Instant meat paste, assuming they aren’t a cartoon character in disguise.

                • dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  7
                  arrow-down
                  7
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  I reject your premise. Alabama’s government could have just said “we can’t get the drugs for lethal injection, so we’re not doing the death penalty any more.” Instead they said “we’re going through hell and high water to kill this guy.” Fuck them. The death penalty is morally wrong because it puts every member of a democratic society in the position of being a killer.

                  • astral_avocado@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    10 months ago

                    Nitrogen is cheap, I doubt it was that much harder to acquire that and a breathing mask to do this.

                • snooggums@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  arrow-down
                  10
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  I will not choose a method because all options require a trained an licensed medical professional to implement humanely, and nobody who qualifies will participate because they have ethics that prohibit causing harm to be licensed medical professionals. That includes putting someone to death against their will.

                  Picking a method is agreeing with the assumption that we have to put people to death.

                  The thing is, all of the humane ways to kill someone require the person to be a willing participant in the process. Nitrogen works when the person is relaxed and breathing normally for example.

                  • cynar@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    7
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    10 months ago

                    So you’d rather have someone die in agony, rather than make a decision?

                    I’m asking that if an evil must happen, should it be a different, lesser evil, or a normalised greater evil? The whether the evil should happen at all is a separate debate.

                    As I said, I agree with you on the latter. The death penalty shouldn’t be a thing. I’m asking about the situation until you (as a society) actually get that far.

                  • halyk.the.red@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    5
                    ·
                    10 months ago

                    All options do not require a medical professional to administer. It does not take someone with a doctor’s knowledge or skill to make an airproof chamber. It won’t take a doctor to set up a system to add air to the chamber. You don’t need to be a doctor to rig a way to flood the chamber with another gas and remove the oxygen. Non-doctors can wheel him in, strapped to a bed. Then the regular pre-PhD’s can operate the system. Now the scientists and engineers to design this death trap may have doctorates, but they don’t need medical licenses. Design it well enough and a chimp or small child can operate the chamber controls. You will need a medical professional to declare death, though.

                • snooggums@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  7
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  A person who is doing it voluntarily for suicide would not be struggling against impending doom and would be breathing normally. The context here is execution against someone’s will.

                  • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    10 months ago

                    the impending doom is coming in either scenario, either you play it up, fight it, and die trying, or you just follow through with it.

                    That’s a conscious choice people are capable of making in that scenario.

                    If you don’t want to struggle, you just breath normally.

          • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            you are conflating waterboarding with non consensual, but expected waterboarding.

            He isn’t going to get out of it, but it’s also not like he has no idea whats going to happen.

            How to deal with waterboarding? Don’t breath.

            • KISSmyOS@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              10 months ago

              How to deal with waterboarding? Don’t breath.

              The people waterboarding you will just keep pouring water until you start breathing.

            • snooggums@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              10 months ago

              you are conflating waterboarding with non consensual, but expected waterboarding.

              What?

              • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                10 months ago

                if you’re a prisoner on death row, it’s not exactly like you have zero advanced notice of whats going to happen.

                Given that bureaucracy exists, i think it might be prudent to say that you might even have ALL of the advanced notice one could possibly want in that scenario.

      • DaddleDew@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        It is not fair to liken this to being held underwater. When forced to hold your breathyour lungs fill with CO2 which will cause pain, an urge to breathe and a primal urge to panic because your body has evolved the ability to sense this excess of CO2 to force you to breathe. But when breathing pure nitrogen your body doesn’t have an evolved way to detect it besides minor symptoms that you may or may not notice until you pass out.

        Yes, the very idea that you will die can be emotionally distressing but this will be common to all methods of execution.

    • grilledcheesecowboy@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      A lot of people are focused on this quote:

      Witness Reverend Jeff Hood told reporters he saw a man ‘struggling for their life’ for 22 minutes as Smith became the first US death row inmate executed by nitrogen asphyxia

      Which says to me that from the time they brought him in and strapped him down until he died lasted about 22 minutes and the murderer struggled physically against the restraints the entire time.

      This quote farther down suggests from the time they started administering the gas until he died only took a couple of minutes:

      But, witnesses said Smith appeared conscious for several minutes, shaking and writhing on the gurney.

      Several could be 25, and he could have been shaking from pain and agony, but it seems more likely he was holding his breath and shaking out of fear while trying to fight and get free.

      Keep in mind that the first quote is from his anti-death penalty spiritual advisor and this entire article is brought to us by a magazine with an “end the death penalty campaign”.

      I’m generally anti-death penalty myself, but nitrogen asphyxiation seems way better than electrocution, lethal injection, or hanging. They could probably do it better by using some kind of general anesthesia to render him unconscious and then flood the room with pure nitrogen, or even just get rid if the death penalty all together. Unfortunately this is the world we live in and so fae this is the least bad option we’ve seen.

      • Tinidril@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        10 months ago

        How dare you actually read the story!?

        I do have some reservations about the idea of a compassionate execution method. It’s kinda like tasers. Yes, they are a huge improvement on the alternative, but that also means they get used a lot more frequently.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      10 months ago

      The point of the exercise was to sit in a room with a mask on, recognize the symptoms of hypoxia when we experienced them and throw a lever that would resume normal air breathing once we had enough.

      So you weren’t fighting for your life.

    • dumpsterlid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      Had I not thrown the lever and there were no instructors to do it for me I would have died a few moments later.

      You did that shit for a job? I hope they paid you well, sounds like you could have easily died if something went wrong…

    • ikidd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      I can’t say that I’d be giggly about having my brain cells oxygen deprived for going on 5 minutes.